[Direct naar content](#content) Menuhttps://www.overheid.nl/Wettenbank - [Overheid.nl](#other-sites) - [Eenvoudig zoeken](/zoeken) - [Uitgebreid zoeken](/uitgebreid_zoeken) - [Toekomstige regelgeving zoeken](/toekomstig_zoeken) - [Zoeken in EU-richtlijnen](/zoeken_op_eu-richtlijn) [Overheid.nl](#other-sites) U bent hier: - [Zoeken](/zoeken) - [Zoekresultaten](#) - [Regeling](/BWBV0001109/2004-12-28/0#Verdrag_2) - Afdrukken # Overeenkomst tussen het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden en de Verenigde Staten van Amerika [...] met betrekking tot belastingen naar het inkomen, Washington, 18-12-1992 Geraadpleegd op 20-10-2026. Afdrukken[Annuleren](/BWBV0001109/2004-12-28/0#Verdrag_2) ## Authentiek : EN #### Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United States of America for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Government of the United States of America, desiring to replace by a new convention the [Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United States of America with respect to taxes on income and certain other taxes](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0005531) signed at Washington on April 29, 1948, as modified and supplemented by the Supplementary Convention signed at Washington on December 30, 1965, Have agreed as follows: ### CHAPTER I. SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION #### Article 1. General Scope - 1 This Convention shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the States, except as otherwise provided in the Convention. - 2 The Convention shall not restrict in any manner any exclusion, exemption, deduction, credit, or other allowance now or hereafter accorded: - a) by the laws of either State, except, as regards the Netherlands, with respect to [Article 25](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIV_Artikel25) (Methods of Elimination of Double Taxation); or - b) by any other agreement between the States. - 3 - a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraph 2 b): - (i) any question arising as to the interpretation or application of this Convention and, in particular, whether a taxation measure is within the scope of this Convention shall be determined exclusively in accordance with the provisions of [Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure) of this Convention; and - (ii) the provisions of Article XVII of the General Agreement on Trade in Services shall not apply to a taxation measure unless the competent authorities agree that the measure is not within the scope of [Article 28](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel28) (Non-Discrimination) of this Convention. - b) For the purpose of this paragraph, a “measure” is a law, regulation, rule, procedure, decision, administrative action, or any similar provision or action. #### Article 2. Taxes covered - 1 The existing taxes to which this Convention shall apply are in particular: - a) in the Netherlands: - - de inkomstenbelasting (income tax), - - de loonbelasting (wages tax), - - de vennootschapsbelasting (company tax), including the government share in the net profits of the exploitation of natural resources levied pursuant to the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) hereinafter referred to as ’profit share”, - - de dividendbelasting (dividend tax), (hereinafter referred to as “Netherlands tax”); - b) in the United States: the Federal income taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (but excluding social security taxes), and the excise taxes imposed on insurance premiums paid to foreign insurers and with respect to private foundations (hereinafter referred to as “United States tax”). The Convention shall, however, apply to the excise taxes imposed on insurance premiums paid to foreign insurers only to the extent that the risks covered by such premiums are not reinsured with a person not entitled to the benefits of this or any other convention which provides exemption from these taxes. - 2 The Convention shall apply also to any identical or substantially similar taxes which are imposed after the date of signature of the Convention in addition to, or in place of, the existing taxes. The competent authorities of the States shall notify each other of any substantial changes which have been made in their respective taxation laws. ### CHAPTER II. DEFINITIONS #### Artikel 3. General definitions - 1 For the purposes of this Convention, unless the context otherwise requires: - a) the term “State” means the Netherlands or the United States, as the context requires; the term “States” means the Netherlands and the United States; - b) the term “the Netherlands” comprises the part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands that is situated in Europe and the part of the sea bed and its sub-soil under the North Sea, over which the Kingdom of the Netherlands has sovereign rights in accordance with international law for the purpose of exploration for and exploitation of the natural resources of such areas, but only to the extent that the person, property, or activity to which this Convention is being applied is connected with such exploration or exploitation; - c) - i) the term “United States” means the United States of America, but does not include Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, or any other United States possession or territory; - ii) when used in a geographical sense, the term “United States” means the states thereof and the District of Columbia. Such term also includes (A) the territorial sea thereof and (B) the sea bed and sub-soil of the submarine areas adjacent to that territorial sea, over which the United States exercises sovereign rights in accordance with international law for the purpose of exploration for and exploitation of the natural resources of such areas, but only to the extent that the person, property, or activity to which this Convention is being applied is connected with such exploration or exploitation; - d) the term “person” includes an individual, an estate, a trust, a company and any other body of persons; - e) the term “company” means any body corporate or any entity which is treated as a body corporate for tax purposes; - f) the terms “enterprise of one of the States” and “enterprise of the other State” mean respectively an enterprise carried on by a resident of one of the States and an enterprise carried on by a resident of the other State; - g) the term “nationals” means: - i) all individuals possessing the nationality or citizenship of one of the States; - ii) all legal persons, partnerships and associations deriving their status as such from the laws in force in one of the States; - h) the term “international traffic” means any transport by a ship or aircraft operated by an enterprise of one of the States, except when the ship or aircraft is operated solely between places within the other State; - i) the term “competent authority” means: - i) in the Netherlands: the Minister of Finance or his duly authorized representative; and - ii) in the United States: the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate. - 2 As regards the application of the Convention by one of the States any term not defined therein shall, unless the context otherwise requires or the competent authorities agree to a common meaning pursuant to the provisions of [Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure), have the meaning which it has under the law of that State concerning the taxes to which the Convention applies. #### Article 4. Resident - 1 For the purposes of this Convention, the term “resident of one of the States” means any person who, under the laws of that State, is liable to tax therein by reason of his domicile, residence, place of management, place of incorporation, or any other criterion of a similar nature, or that is an exempt pension trust, as dealt with in [Article 35](#Verdrag_1_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel35) (Exempt Pension Trust) and that is a resident of that State according to the laws of that State, or an exempt organization, as dealt with in [Article 36](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel36) (Exempt Organizations) and that is a resident of that State according to the laws of that State. If, under the laws of the two States, an individual is a resident of both States, his residence for purposes of the Convention shall be determined under the rules of paragraph 2. An individual who is a resident of one of the States under the law of that State, or who is a citizen of the United States, and who is not a resident of the other State under its law, will, for the purposes of this paragraph, be treated as a resident of the State of which he is a resident or citizen only if (i) he would be a resident of that State and not a third State, under the principles of subparagraphs (a) and (b) of paragraph 2 of this Article, if that third State is one with which the first-mentioned State does not have a comprehensive income tax Convention, or (ii) he is a resident of that State and not a third State, if that third State is one with which the first-mentioned State does have a comprehensive income tax Convention, under the provisions of that Convention. However, the term “resident of one of the States” does not include any person who is liable to tax in that State in respect only of income from sources in that State. - 2 Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1, an individual is a resident of both States, then his status shall be determined as follows: - a) he shall be deemed to be a resident of the State in which he has a permanent home available to him; if he has a permanent home available to him in both States, he shall be deemed to be a resident of the State with which his personal and economic relations are closer (centre of vital interests); - b) if the State in which he has his centre of vital interests cannot be determined, or if he has not a permanent home available to him in either State, he shall be deemed to be a resident of the State in which he has an habitual abode; - c) if he has an habitual abode in both States or in neither of them, he shall be deemed to be a resident of the State of which he is a national; - d) if he is a national of both States or of neither of them, the competent authorities of the States shall settle the question by mutual agreement. - 3 Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1, a person other than an individual or a company is a resident of both States, the competent authorities of the States shall settle the question by mutual agreement and determine the mode of application of the Convention to such person. - 4 Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1, a company is a resident of both States, the competent authorities of the States shall endeavour to settle the question by mutual agreement, having regard to the company's place of effective management, the place where it is incorporated or otherwise constituted and any other relevant factors. In the absence of such agreement, such company shall not be entitled to claim any benefits under this Convention, except that such company may claim the benefits of [paragraph 4 of Article 25](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIV_Artikel25) (Methods of Elimination of Double Taxation) and of [Articles 28](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel28) (Non-discrimination), [29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure) and [37](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukVI_Artikel37) (Entry into Force). #### Article 5. Permanent establishment - 1 For the purposes of this Convention, the term “permanent establishment” means a fixed place of business through which the business of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on. - 2 The term “permanent establishment” includes especially: - a) a place of management; - b) a branch; - c) an office; - d) a factory; - e) a workshop; and - f) a mine, an oil or gas well, a quarry or any other place of extraction of natural resources. - 3 A building site or construction or installation project constitutes a permanent establishment only if it lasts more than twelve months. - 4 Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Article, the term “permanent establishment” shall be deemed not to include: - a) the use of facilities solely for the purpose of storage, display or delivery of goods or merchandise belonging to the enterprise; - b) the maintenance of a stock of goods or merchandise belonging to the enterprise solely for the purpose of storage, display or delivery; - c) the maintenance of a stock of goods or merchandise belonging to the enterprise solely for the purpose of processing by another enterprise; - d) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for the purpose of purchasing goods or merchandise, or of collecting information, for the enterprise; - e) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for the purpose of carrying on, for the enterprise, any other activity of a preparatory or auxiliary character; - f) the maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for any combination of the activities mentioned in subparagraphs (a) to (e), provided that the overall activity of the fixed place of business resulting from this combination is of a preparatory or auxiliary character. - 5 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2, where a person - other than an agent of an independent status to whom paragraph 6 applies - is acting on behalf of an enterprise and has, and habitually exercises, in one of the States an authority to conclude contracts in the name of the enterprise, that enterprise shall be deemed to have a permanent establishment in that State in respect of any activities which that person undertakes for the enterprise, unless the activities of such person are limited to those mentioned in paragraph 4 which, if exercised through a fixed place of business, would not make this fixed place of business a permanent establishment under the provisions of that paragraph. - 6 An enterprise shall not be deemed to have a permanent establishment in one of the States merely because it carries on business in that State through a broker, general commission agent or any other agent of an independent status, provided that such persons are acting in the ordinary course of their business. - 7 The fact that a company which is a resident of one of the States controls or is controlled by a company which is a resident of the other State, or which carries on business in that other State (whether through a permanent establishment or otherwise), shall not of itself constitute either company a permanent establishment of the other. ### CHAPTER III. TAXATION OF INCOME #### Article 6. Income from real property - 1 Income derived by a resident of one of the States from real property (including income from agriculture or forestry) situated in the other State may be taxed in that other State. - 2 The term “real property” shall have the meaning which it has under the law of the State in which the property in question is situated. The term shall in any case include property accessory to real property, livestock and equipment used in agriculture and forestry, rights to which the provisions of general law respecting landed property apply, usufruct of real property and rights to variable or fixed payments as consideration for the working of, or the right to work, mineral deposits, sources and other natural resources; ships and aircraft shall not be regarded as real property. - 3 The provisions of paragraph 1 shall apply to income derived from the direct use, letting, or use in any other form of real property. - 4 The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 3 shall also apply to the income from real property of an enterprise and to income from real property used for the performance of independent personal services. - 5 A resident of one of the States who is liable to tax in the other State on income from real property situated in the other State may elect for any taxable year to compute the tax on such income on a net basis as if such income were attributable to a permanent establishment in such other State. Any such election shall be binding for the taxable year of the election and all subsequent taxable years unless the competent authorities of the States, pursuant to a request by the taxpayer made to the competent authority of the State of which the taxpayer is a resident, agree to terminate the election. - 6 Exploration and exploitation rights of the sea bed, its sub-soil, and natural resources found therein (including rights to interests in, or to benefits of, assets to be produced by such exploration or exploitation) shall be regarded as real property situated in the State in which such sea bed, sub-soil, and natural resources are located. Such rights shall be considered to pertain to the property of a permanent establishment in that State to the same extent that any item of real property located in that State would be considered to pertain to a permanent establishment in that State. #### Article 7. Business profits - 1 The profits of an enterprise of one of the States shall be taxable only in that State unless the enterprise carries on business in the other State through a permanent establishment situated therein. If the enterprise carries on business as aforesaid, the profits of the enterprise may be taxed in the other State but only so much of them as is attributable to that permanent establishment. - 2 Subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, where an enterprise of one of the States carries on business in the other State through a permanent establishment situated therein, there shall in each State be attributed to that permanent establishment the profits which it might be expected to make if it were a distinct and separate enterprise engaged in the same or similar activities under the same or similar conditions and dealing wholly independently with the enterprise of which it is a permanent establishment. - 3 In determining the profits of a permanent establishment, there shall be allowed as deductions expenses which are incurred for the purposes of the permanent establishment, including executive and general administrative expenses, research and development expenses, interest, and other expenses incurred for the purposes of the enterprise as a whole (or the part thereof which includes the permanent establishment), whether incurred in the State in which the permanent establishment is situated or elsewhere. - 4 No profits shall be attributed to a permanent establishment by reason of the mere purchase by that permanent establishment of goods or merchandise for the enterprise. - 5 For the purposes of the preceding paragraphs the profits to be attributed to the permanent establishment shall include only the profits derived from the assets or activities of the permanent establishment and shall be determined by the same method year by year unless there is good and sufficient reason to the contrary. - 6 Where profits include items of income which are dealt with separately in other Articles of the Convention, then the provisions of those Articles shall not be affected by the provisions of this Article. - 7 The United States tax on insurance premiums paid to foreign insurers, to the extent that it is a covered tax under [paragraph 1 (b) of Article 2](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukI_Artikel2) (Taxes Covered), shall not be imposed on insurance or reinsurance premiums which are the receipts of a business of insurance carried on by an enterprise of the Netherlands whether or not that business is carried on through a permanent establishment in the United States. #### Article 8. Shipping and Air Transport - 1 Profits derived by an enterprise of one of the States from the operation of ships or aircraft in international traffic shall be taxable only in that State. - 2 For the purposes of this Article, profits from the operation of ships or aircraft in international traffic include profits derived from the rental of ships or aircraft if such rental profits are incidental to profits described in paragraph 1. - 3 The provisions of paragraph 1 shall also apply to the proportionate share of profits derived from the participation in a pool, a joint business or an international operating agency. The proportionateshare shall be treated as derived directly from the operation of ships or aircraft in international traffic. #### Article 9. Associated Enterprises - 1 Where - a) an enterprise of one of the States participates directly or indirectly in the management, control or capital of an enterprise of the other State; or - b) the same persons participate directly or indirectly in the management, control, or capital of an enterprise of one of the States and an enterprise of the other State, and in either case conditions are made or imposed between the two enterprises in their commercial or financial relations which differ from those which would be made between independent enterprises, then any income, deductions, receipts, allowances or outgoings which would, but for those conditions, have accrued to one of the enterprises, but, by reason of those conditions, have not so accrued, may be included in the profits of that enterprise and taxed accordingly. It is understood, however, that the fact that associated enterprises have concluded arrangements, such as cost sharing arrangements or general services agreements, for or based on the allocation of executive, general administrative, technical and commercial expenses, research and development expenses and other similar expenses, is not in itself a condition as meant in the preceding sentence. - 2 Where one of the States includes in the profits of an enterprise of that State - and taxes accordingly profits on which an enterprise of the other State has been charged to tax in that other State, and the profits so included are profits which would have accrued to the enterprise of the first-mentioned State if the conditions made between the two enterprises had been those which would have been made between independent enterprises, then that other State shall make an appropriate adjustment to the amount of the tax charged therein on those profits. In determining such adjustment, due regard shall be had to the other provisions of this Convention and the competent authorities of the States shall if necessary consult each other. #### Article 10. Dividends - 1 Dividends paid by a company which is a resident of one of the States to a resident of the other State may be taxed in that other State. - 2 However, such dividends may also be taxed in the State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident and according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a resident of the other State, the tax so charged shall not exceed: - a) 5 percent of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner is a company which holds directly at least 10 percent of the voting power in the company paying the dividends; and - b) 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases. - 3 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, dividends shall not be taxed in the State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident if the person who is the beneficial owner of the dividends is a company that is a resident of the other State that has owned directly shares representing 80 percent or more of the voting power in the company paying the dividends for a 12-month period ending on the date the dividend is declared and: - a) owned, directly or indirectly, shares representing at least 80 percent of the voting power in the company paying the dividends prior to October 1st, 1998; - b) is a qualified person by reason of [subparagraph c) of paragraph 2 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits); - c) is entitled to benefits with respect to the dividends under [paragraph 3 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26); or - d) has received a determination pursuant to [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) with respect to this paragraph. - 4 - a) Subparagraph a) of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 shall not apply in the case of dividends paid by a United States person that is a Regulated Investment Company (RIC) or a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) or in the case of dividends paid by a Dutch company that is a “beleggingsinstelling” in the sense of Article 28 of the Netherlands Corporation Tax Act (Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969) (hereinafter referred to as “beleggingsinstelling”). - b) In the case of dividends paid by a RIC or a beleggingsinstelling, subparagraph b) of paragraph 2 shall apply. - c) In the case of dividends paid by a REIT or, notwithstanding subparagraph b) of this paragraph 4, by a beleggingsinstelling that invests in real estate to the same extent as is required of a REIT, subparagraph b) of paragraph 2 shall apply only if: - (i) the beneficial owner of the dividends is an individual holding an interest of not more than 25 percent in the REIT or beleggingsinstelling; - (ii) the dividends are paid with respect to a class of stock that is publicly traded and the beneficial owner of the dividends holds an interest of not more than 5 percent of any class of the stock of the REIT or beleggingsinstelling; - (iii) the beneficial owner of the dividends holds an interest of not more than 10 percent in the REIT or beleggingsinstelling and the gross value of no single interest in real property held by the REIT or beleggingsinstelling exceeds 10 percent of the gross value of the total interest in real property held by the REIT or beleggingsinstelling; or - (iv) the beneficial owner is a beleggingsinstelling, in the case of dividends paid by a REIT, or a RIC or a REIT, in the case of dividends paid by a beleggingsinstelling. - 5 The provisions of the preceding paragraphs shall not affect the taxation of the company in respect of the profits out of which the dividends are paid. - 6 The term “dividends” as used in this Convention means income from shares or other rights participating in profits, as well as income from other corporate rights which is subjected to the same taxation treatment as income from shares by the laws of the State of which the company making the distribution is a resident. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term “dividends” also includes, in the case of the Netherlands, income from debt claims that is subjected to the same taxation treatment as income from shares and, in the case of the United States, income from debt obligations carrying the right to participate in profits. - 7 The provisions of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this Article shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the dividends, being a resident of one of the States, carries on business in the other State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident, through a permanent establishment situated therein, or performs in that other State independent personal services from a fixed base situated therein, and the holding in respect of which the dividends are paid forms part of the business property of such permanent establishment or pertains to such fixed base. In that case the provisions of [Article 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits) or [Article 15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services), as the case may be, shall apply. - 8 Where a company which is a resident of one of the States derives profits or income from the other State, that other State may not impose any tax on the dividends paid by the company, except insofar as such dividends are paid to a resident of that other State or insofar as the holding in respect of which the dividends are paid forms part of the business property of a permanent establishment or pertains to a fixed base situated in that other State, nor, except as provided in [Article 11](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel11) (Branch Tax), subject the company's undistributed profits to a tax on the company's undistributed profits, even if the dividends paid or the undistributed profits consist wholly or partly of profits or income arising in such other State. #### Article 11. Branch Tax - 1 A corporation which is a resident of one of the States and which has a permanent establishment in the other State or which is subject to tax on a net basis in that other State under [Article 6](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel6) (Income from Real Property) or under [paragraph 1 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains), may be subject in that other State to a tax in addition to the tax allowable under the other provisions of this Convention. Such tax, however, may be imposed only on that portion of the business profits of the corporation attributable to the permanent establishment under this Convention or the income subject to tax on a net basis under Article 6 (Income from Real Property) or under paragraph 1 of Article 14 (Capital Gains) and reduced for all taxes chargeable in that State on such profits and income, other than the additional tax referred to herein, and further reduced (but not below zero) for any increase in the net equity attributable to such permanent establishment at the end of the taxation year, as measured from the end of the preceding taxation year, and increased (but not in excess of the accumulated profits) for any decrease in the net equity attributable to such permanent establishment at the end of the taxation year, as measured from the end of the preceding taxation year. - 2 Notwithstanding paragraph 4, for purposes of this Article, the term “accumulated profits” means the excess of the aggregate profits referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article for all the preceding taxation years during which this Convention was in effect, over the aggregate profits taxed under this Article during such preceding taxation years. - 3 The tax referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be imposed at a rate exceeding the rate specified in [paragraph 2(a) of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends). Paragraph 1 shall not apply in the case of a company that: - a) prior to October 1st, 1998 was engaged in activities giving rise to profits attributable to that permanent establishment or to income or gains to which the provisions of [Article 6](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel6) or, as the case may be, [paragraph 1 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) apply; - b) is a qualified person by reason of [subparagraph c) of paragraph 2 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) of this Convention; or - c) is entitled to benefits with respect to the dividends under [paragraph 3 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26); or - d) has received a determination pursuant to [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) with respect to this paragraph. - 4 In the case of the United States, the additional tax described in paragraph 1 may be imposed upon the “dividend equivalent amount” (as that term is defined in the law of the United States as on the date of signature of this Convention and as that law may be amended from time to time, but only to the extent that this definition, as amended, is in conformity with the principles of this Article). - 5 Notwithstanding paragraph 4, no additional tax may be imposed under paragraph 1 with respect to income subject to tax under [paragraph 1 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains) which is derived from the disposition of shares or other comparable corporate rights in a company. #### Article 12. Interest - 1 Interest arising in one of the States and beneficially owned by a resident of the other State shall be taxable only in that other State. - 2 The term “interest” as used in this Convention means income from debt-claims of every kind, whether or not secured by mortgage, and not carrying a right to participate in the debtor's profits, and in particular, income from government securities, and income from bonds or debentures, including premiums and prizes attaching to such securities, bonds, or debentures, and an excess inclusion with respect to a residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit, as well as other income that is treated as income from money lent by the taxation law of the State in which the income arises. The term does not include income dealt with in [Article 10](#) (Dividends). Penalty charges for late payment shall not be regarded as interest for the purpose of this Convention. - 3 The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the interest, being a resident of one of the States, carries on business in the other State, in which the interest arises, through a permanent establishment situated therein, or performs in that other State independent personal services from a fixed base situated therein, and the interest paid is attributable to such permanent establishment or fixed base. In such case the provisions of [Article 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits) or [Article 15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services), as the case may be, shall apply. - 4 Interest shall be deemed to arise in one of the States when the payer is that State itself, or a political subdivision, a local authority, or a resident of that State. Where, however, the person paying the interest, whether he is a resident of one of the States or not, has in one of the States a permanent establishment or a fixed base in connection with which the indebtedness on which the interest is paid was incurred, or has income otherwise subject to the tax described in [Article 11](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel11) (Branch Tax), and such interest is borne by such permanent establishment or fixed base or is allocable to the income subject to the tax described in Article 11 (Branch Tax), then such interest shall be deemed to arise in the State in which the permanent establishment or fixed base is situated or in which the income is subject to the tax described in Article 11 (Branch Tax). - 5 Where, by reason of a special relationship between the payer and the beneficial owner or between both of them and some other person, the amount of the interest, having regard to the debt-claim for which it is paid, exceeds the amount which would have been agreed upon by the payer and the beneficial owner in the absence of such relationship, the provisions of this Article shall apply only to the last-mentioned amount. In such case the excess part of the payments shall remain taxable according to the laws of each State, due regard being had to the other provisions of this Convention. - 6 A State may not impose any tax on interest paid by a resident of the other State, except insofar as - a) the interest is paid to a resident of the first-mentioned State; - b) the interest is attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed base situated in the first-mentioned State; or - c) the interest arises in the first-mentioned State and is not paid to a resident of the other State. Where the payer of the interest is a resident of one of the States and has a permanent establishment in the other State or has income otherwise subject to the tax described in [Article 11](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel11) (Branch Tax), then to the extent the amount of the interest arising in such other State by reason of the permanent establishment or by reason of income subject to the tax described in Article 11 (Branch Tax) exceeds the total amount of interest paid by such permanent establishment or in connection with income otherwise subject to the tax described in Article 11 (Branch Tax), such excess amount shall be treated as interest derived and beneficially owned by a resident of the first-mentioned State. - 7 The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply to an excess inclusion with respect to a residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit. - 8 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, interest arising in one of the States and beneficially owned by an enterprise of the other State and attributable to a permanent establishment of that enterprise in a third jurisdiction, may also be taxed in the first-mentioned State if the profits of that permanent establishment are subject to an aggregate rate of tax, in the other State and the third jurisdiction in which the permanent establishment is situated, that is, in the case of interest arising in the first-mentioned State and beneficially owned by an enterprise of the other State before January 1, 1998, less than 50 percent of the general rate of company tax applicable in the other State, and in the case of interest arising in the first-mentioned State and beneficially owned by an enterprise of the other State on or after January 1,1998, less than 60 percent of the general rate of company tax applicable in the other State, but the tax so charged shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross amount of such interest. However, the provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to interest derived in connection with or incidental to the active conduct of a trade or business carried on by the permanent establishment in the third jurisdiction (other than the business of making or managing investments, unless these activities are banking or insurance activities carried on by a bank or insurance company). #### Article 13. Royalties - 1 Royalties arising in one of the States and beneficially owned by a resident of the other State shall be taxable only in that other State. - 2 The term “royalties” as used in this Convention means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic, or scientific work (but not including motion pictures or works on film, tape or other means of reproduction used for radio or television broadcasting), any patent, trademark, trade name, brand name, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience. The term “royalties” also includes gains derived from the alienation of any such right or property which are contingent on the productivity, use, or disposition thereof. - 3 The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the royalties, being a resident of one of the States, carries on business in the other State, in which the royalties arise, through a permanent establishment situated therein, or performs in that other State independent personal services from a fixed base situated therein, and the royalties are attributable to such permanent establishment or fixed base. In such case the provisions of [Article 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits) or [Article 15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services), as the case may be, shall apply. - 4 Where, by reason of a special relationship between the payer and the beneficial owner or between both of them and some other person, the amount of the royalties, having regard to the use, right, or information for which they are paid, exceeds the amount which would have been agreed upon by the payer and the beneficial owner in the absence of such relationship, the provisions of this Article shall apply only to the last-mentioned amount. In such case the excess part of the payments shall remain taxable according to the laws of each State, due regard being had to the other provisions of this Convention. - 5 A State may not impose any tax on royalties paid by a resident of the other State, except insofar as - a) the royalties are paid to a resident of the first-mentioned State; - b) the royalties are attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed base situated in the first-mentioned State; - c) the contract under which the royalties are paid was concluded in connection with a permanent establishment or a fixed base which the payer has in the first-mentioned State, and such royalties are borne by such permanent establishment or fixed base and are not paid to a resident of the other State; or - d) royalties are paid in respect of intangible property used in the first-mentioned State and not paid to a resident of the other State, but only where the payer has also received a royalty paid by a resident of the first-mentioned State, or borne by a permanent establishment or base situated in that State, in respect of the use of that property in the first-mentioned State and provided that the use of the intangible property in question is not a component part of nor directly related to the active conduct of a trade or business in which the payer is engaged as meant in [paragraph 2 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits). - 6 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, royalties arising in one of the States and beneficially owned by an enterprise of the other State and attributable to a permanent establishment of that enterprise in a third jurisdiction, may also be taxed in the first-mentioned State if the profits of that permanent establishment are subject to an aggregate rate of tax, in the other State and the third jurisdiction in which the permanent establishment is situated, that is, in the case of royalties arising in the first-mentioned State and beneficially owned by an enterprise of the other State before January 1,1998, less than 50 percent of the general rate of company tax applicable in the other State, and in the case of royalties arising in the first-mentioned State and beneficially owned by an enterprise of the other State on or after January 1,1998, less than 60 percent of the general rate of company tax applicable in the other State, but the tax so charged shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross amount of such royalties. However, the provisions of this paragraph shall not apply if the royalties are received as a compensation for the use of, or the right to use, intangible property produced or developed by the permanent establishment itself. #### Article 14. Capital Gains - 1 Gains derived by a resident of one of the States from the disposition of real property situated in the other State may be taxed in the other State. For the purposes of this paragraph the term “real property situated in the other State” shall include: - a) real property referred to in [Article 6](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel6) (Income from Real Property); and - b) shares or other comparable corporate rights in a company that is a resident of that other State, the assets of which company consist, directly or indirectly, for the greater part of real property situated in that other State, and an interest in a partnership, trust, or estate, to the extent that it is attributable to real property situated in that other State. In the United States, the term includes a “United States real property interest” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code on the date of signature of this Convention, and as amended from time to time without changing the general principles described in this paragraph. - 2 - a) Where after the date this Convention enters into force a person who has been a resident of one of the States continuously since June 18, 1980, alienates real property situated in the other State, the alienation of which could not be taxed by the other State under the provisions of the prior [Convention](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0005531) as defined in [paragraph 2 of Article 37](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukVI_Artikel37) (Entry into Force), and either: - i) the resident owned the alienated property continuously from June 18,1980 until the date of alienation; or - ii) each of the following conditions is satisfied: - A) the resident acquired the alienated property in a transaction that qualified for non-recognition (determined without regard to section 897 of the Internal Revenue Code) for purposes of taxation in the other State, and the resident has owned the property continuously since such acquisition; and - B) the resident's initial basis in the alienated property was equal to either the basis of the property that the resident exchanged for the alienated property, or the basis of the alienated property in the hands of the person transferring the property to the resident immediately prior to the transfer; then the gain liable to tax in the other State under this Article shall be reduced by the portion of the gain attributable proportionately, on a monthly basis, to the period ending on December 31, 1984, or such greater portion as is shown to the satisfaction of the competent authority of that other State to be attributable to that period. - b) The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply unless, during the period from January 1, 1992, through the date of alienation, the resident, and any other person who owned the property during such period, was entitled to the benefits of this Article under [Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits), or would have been so entitled if the Convention had been in effect throughout such period. In addition, during the period from June 18, 1980, through December 31, 1991, each person who owned the property must have been a resident of one of the States under the prior [Convention](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0005531) as defined in [paragraph 2 of Article 37](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukVI_Artikel37) (Entry into Force). - c) The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to the alienation of property that: - i) formed part of the property of a permanent establishment, or ned to a fixed base, situated in the other State at any time on or after June 18,1980; - ii) was acquired directly or indirectly by any person on or after June 18, 1980, in a transaction that did not qualify for non-recognition (determined without regard to section 897 of the Internal Revenue Code), or in a transaction in which it was acquired in exchange for an asset that was acquired in a transaction that did not qualify for non-recognition (determined without regard to section 897 of the Internal Revenue Code); or - iii) was acquired, directly or indirectly, by any person on or after June 18,1980, in exchange for property described in clause (i) or (ii) of this subparagraph, or property the alienation of which could have been taxed by the other State under the provisions of the prior [Convention](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0005531) as defined in [paragraph 2 of Article 37](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukVI_Artikel37)(Entry into Force). - 3 Gains from the alienation of personal property forming part of the business property of a permanent establishment which an enterprise of one of the States has in the other State or of personal property pertaining to a fixed base available to a resident of one of the States in the other State for the purpose of performing independent personal services, including such gains from the alienation of such permanent establishment (alone or with the whole enterprise) or of such fixed base, may be taxed in that other State. - 4 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 3, gains from the deemed alienation of tangible depreciable personal property forming part of the business property of a permanent establishment which an enterprise of one of the States has in the other State under [paragraph 3 of Article 27](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel27) (Offshore Activities) or of tangible depreciable personal property pertaining to a fixed base available to a resident of one of the States in the other State under paragraph 5 of Article 27 (Offshore Activities) for the purpose of performing independent personal services, shall be taxable only in the State of residence of the enterprise if the period during which the tangible depreciable personal property forms part of the business property of such permanent establishment or pertains to such fixed base is less than 3 months and provided that the actual alienation of the tangible depreciable personal property does not take place within 1 year after the date of its deemed alienation. If the gain from the deemed alienation of the tangible depreciable personal property is taxable only in the State of residence of the enterprise, in determining the profits of the permanent establishment or the fixed base in the other State the depreciation with respect to such tangible depreciable personal property will be based on the lower of book value or market value, measured when such property became part of the business property of the permanent establishment or such property first pertained to the fixed base. - 5 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 3, gains derived by an enterprise of one of the States from the alienation of ships and aircraft operated in international traffic, and of personal property pertaining to the operation of such ships and aircraft shall be taxable only in that State. - 6 Gains described in [Article 13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties) shall be taxable in accordance with the provisions of Article 13. - 7 Gains from the alienation of any property other than property referred to in paragraphs 1 through 5 shall be taxable only in the State of which the alienator is a resident. - 8 Where a resident of one of the States alienates property in the course of a corporate organization, reorganization, amalgamation, division or similar transaction and profit, gain or income with respect to such alienation is not recognized or is deferred for the purpose of taxation in that State, then any tax that would otherwise be imposed by the other State with respect to such alienation will also be deferred to the extent and time as such tax would have been deferred if the alienator had been a resident of the other State, but no longer and in no greater amount than in the first-mentioned State provided that such tax can be collected upon a later alienation and the collection of the amount of tax in question upon the later alienation is secured to the satisfaction of the competent authority of both of the States. The competent authorities of the States shall develop procedures for implementing this paragraph. - 9 The provisions of paragraph 7 shall not affect the right of each of the States to levy according to its own law a tax on gains from the alienation of shares or other corporate rights participating in profits in a company, the capital of which is wholly or partly divided into shares and which, under the laws of that State is a resident thereof, derived by an individual who is a resident of the other State and who: - a) has, at any time during the five-year period preceding the alienation, been a resident of the first-mentioned State, and - b) at the time of the alienation owns, either alone or together with related individuals, at least 25 percent of any class of shares of such company. For purposes of this paragraph the term “related individuals” means the alienator's spouse and his relatives (by blood or marriage) in the direct line (ancestors and lineal descendents) and his relatives (by whole or half blood or by marriage) in the second degree in the collateral line (siblings or their spouses). #### Article 15. Independent Personal Services - 1 Income derived by an individual who is a resident of one of the States from the performance of personal services in an independent capacity shall be taxable only in that State, unless such services are not performed in that State and the income derived therefrom is attributable to a fixed base regularly available to the individual in the other State for the purpose of performing his activities. - 2 The term “personal services in an independent capacity” includes especially independent scientific, literary, artistic, educational or teaching activities as well as the independent activities of physicians, lawyers, engineers, architects, dentists and accountants. #### Article 16. Dependent Personal Services - 1 Subject to the provisions of [Articles 17](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel17) (Directors' Fees), [19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony), [20](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel20) (Government Service), and [21](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel21) (Professors and Teachers), salaries, wages, and other similar remuneration derived by a resident of one of the States in respect of an employment shall be taxable only in that State unless the employment is exercised in the other State. If the employment is so exercised, such remuneration as is derived therefrom may be taxed in that other State. - 2 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, remuneration derived by a resident of one of the States in respect of an employment exercised in the other State shall be taxable only in the first-mentioned State if - a) the recipient is present in the other State for a period or periods not exceeding in the aggregate 183 days in the taxable year concerned; - b) the remuneration is paid by, or on behalf of, an employer who is not a resident of the other State; and - c) the remuneration is not borne by a permanent establishment or a fixed base which the employer has in the other State. - 3 Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Article, remuneration derived by a resident of one of the States in respect of an employment as a member of the regular complement of a ship or aircraft operated in international traffic, shall be taxable only in that State. #### Article 17. Directors' Fees Directors' fees or other remuneration derived by a resident of one of the States in his capacity as a member of the board of directors, a “bestuurder” or a “commissaris” of a company which is a resident of the other State may be taxed in that other State. However such remuneration shall be taxable only in the first-mentioned State to the extent to which such remuneration is derived from services rendered in that State. #### Article 18. Artistes and Athletes - 1 Notwithstanding the provisions of [Articles 15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services) and [16](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel16) (Dependent Personal Services), income derived by a resident of one of the States as an entertainer, such as a theatre, motion picture, radio, or television artiste, or a musician, or as an athlete, from his personal activities as such exercised in the other State, may be taxed in that other State except where the amount of the gross receipts derived by such entertainer or athlete for the taxable year concerned, including expenses reimbursed to him or borne on his behalf, from such activities does not exceed 10,000 United States dollars or its equivalent in euro on January 1 of the taxable year concerned. In the latter case the exemption can be applied by means of a refund of tax which may have been levied at the source. An application for such refund has to be lodged after the end of the taxable year concerned and within three years after that year. - 2 Where income in respect of activities exercised by an entertainer or an athlete in his capacity as such accrues not to the entertainer or athlete but to another person, that income of that other person may, notwithstanding the provisions of [Articles 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits) and [15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services), be taxed in the State in which the activities of the entertainer or athlete are exercised, unless it is established that neither the entertainer or athlete nor persons related thereto participate directly or indirectly in the profits of that other person in any manner, including the receipts of deferred remuneration, bonuses, fees, dividends, partnership distributions, or other distributions. #### Artikel 19. Pensions, Annuities, Alimony - 1 Subject to the provisions of [paragraph 2 of Article 20](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel20) (Government Service), pensions and other similar remuneration derived and beneficially owned by a resident of one of the States in consideration of past employment and any annuity shall be taxable only in that State. - 2 If, however, an individual deriving remuneration referred to in paragraph 1 was a resident of the other State at any time during the five-year period preceding the date of payment, the remuneration may be taxed in the other State if the remuneration is paid in consideration of employment exercised in the other State and the remuneration is not paid in the form of periodic payments, or a lump sum is paid in lieu of the right to receive an annuity. - 3 The provisions of paragraph 2 shall not apply to the portion of the remuneration or lump sum referred to in paragraph 2 that is contributed to a pension plan or retirement account under such circumstances that, if the remuneration or lump sum had been received from a payer in the State of the recipient's residence, the imposition of tax on the payment by the State of the recipient's residence would be deferred until the amount of the payment was withdrawn from the pension plan or retirement account to which it was contributed. - 4 Subject to the provisions of [paragraph 2 of Article 20](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel20) (Government Service), pensions and other payments made under the provisions of a public social security system and other public pensions paid by one of the States to a resident of the other State or a citizen of the United States shall be taxable only in the first-mentioned State. - 5 The term “annuity” as used in this Article means a stated sum payable periodically at stated times during life or during a specified or ascertainable period of time under an obligation to make the payments in return for adequate and full consideration in money or money's worth. - 6 Alimony paid to a resident of one of the States shall be taxable only in that State. The term “alimony” as used in this paragraph means periodic payments made pursuant to a written separation agreement or a decree of divorce, separate maintenance, or compulsory support, as well as lump sum payments in lieu thereof, which payments are taxable to the recipient under the laws of the State of which he is a resident. - 7 Where an individual who is a resident of one of the States is a member or beneficiary of, or participant in, an exempt pension trust that is a resident of the other State, income earned by the exempt pension trust may be taxed as income of that individual only when, and, subject to the provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article, to the extent that, it is paid to, or for the benefit of, that individual from the exempt pension trust (and not transferred to another exempt pension trust in that other State). - 8 Where an individual who is a member or beneficiary of, or participant in, an exempt pension trust established in one of the States exercises an employment or self-employment in the other State: - a) contributions paid by or on behalf of that individual to the exempt pension trust during the period that he exercises an employment or self-employment in the other State shall be deductible (or excludible) in computing his taxable income in that other State; and - b) any benefits accrued under the exempt pension trust, or contributions made to the exempt pension trust by or on behalf of the individual's employer, during that period shall not be treated as part of the employee's taxable income and any such contributions shall be allowed as a deduction in computing the business profits of his employer in that other State. The relief available under this paragraph shall not exceed the relief that would be allowed by the other State to residents of that State for contributions to, or benefits accrued under, an exempt pension trust established in that State. - 9 The provisions of paragraph 8 of this Article shall not apply unless: - a) contributions by or on behalf of the individual, or by or on behalf of the individual's employer, to the exempt pension trust (or to another similar exempt pension trust for which the first-mentioned exempt pension trust was substituted) were made before the individual began to exercise an employment or self-employment in the other State; and - b) the competent authority of the other State has agreed that the exempt pension trust generally corresponds to an exempt pension trust established in that other State. - 10 - a) Where a citizen of the United States who is a resident of the Netherlands exercises an employment in the Netherlands the income from which is taxable in the Netherlands and is borne by an employer who is a resident of the Netherlands or by a permanent establishment situated in the Netherlands, and the individual is a member or beneficiary of, or participant in, an exempt pension trust established in the Netherlands, - (i) contributions paid by or on behalf of that individual to the exempt pension trust during the period that he exercises the employment in the Netherlands, and that are attributable to the employment, shall be deductible (or excludible) in computing his taxable income in the United States; and - (ii) any benefits accrued under the exempt pension trust, or contributions made to the exempt pension trust by or on behalf of the individual's employer, during that period, and that are attributable to the employment, shall not be treated as part of the employee's taxable income in computing his taxable income in the United States. This paragraph shall apply only to the extent that the contributions or benefits qualify for tax relief in the Netherlands. - b) The relief available under this paragraph shall not exceed the relief that would be allowed by the United States to its residents for contributions to, or benefits accrued under, a generally corresponding exempt pension trust established in the United States. - c) For purposes of determining an individual's eligibility to participate in and receive tax benefits with respect to an exempt pension trust established in the United States, contributions made to, or benefits accrued under, an exempt pension trust established in the Netherlands shall be treated as contributions or benefits under a generally corresponding exempt pension trust established in the United States to the extent relief is available to the individual under this paragraph. - d) This paragraph shall not apply unless the competent authority of the United States has agreed that the exempt pension trust generally corresponds to an exempt pension trust established in the United States. - 11 The benefits of paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 10 will apply with respect to an exempt pension trust that is established in the United States only if the pension trust undertakes to provide information and to provide surety to the tax authorities of the Netherlands in accordance with the Netherlands law regarding designated foreign pension trusts." #### Article 20. Government Service - 1 - a) Remuneration, other than a pension, paid by one of the States or a political subdivision or a local authority thereof to an individual in respect of services rendered to that State or subdivision or authority shall be taxable only in that State. - b) However, such remuneration shall be taxable only in the other State if the services are rendered in that State and the individual is a resident of that State who: - i) is a national of that State; or - ii) did not become a resident of that State solely for the purpose of rendering the services. - 2 - a) Any pension paid by, or out of funds created by, one of the States or a political subdivision or a local authority thereof to an individual in respect of services rendered to that State or subdivision or authority shall be taxable only in that State. - b) However, such pension shall be taxable only in the other State if the individual is a resident of, and a national of, that State. - 3 The provisions of [Articles 16](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel16) (Dependent Personal Services), [17](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel17) (Directors' Fees) and [19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony) shall apply to remuneration and pensions in respect of services rendered in connection with a business carried on by one of the States or a political subdivision or a local authority thereof. #### Article 21. Professors and Teachers - 1 An individual who visits one of the States for a period not exceeding two years for the purpose of teaching or engaging in research at a university, college or other recognized educational institution in that State, and who was immediately before that visit a resident of the other State shall be taxable only in that other State on any remuneration for such teaching or research for a period not exceeding two years from the date he first visits the first-mentioned State for such purpose. If the visit exceeds two years, the first-mentioned State may tax the individual under its national law for the entire period of the visit, unless in a particular case the competent authorities of the States agree otherwise. - 2 This Article shall not apply to income from research if such research is undertaken not in the public interest but primarily for the private benefit of a specific person or persons. #### Article 22. Students and Trainers - 1 An individual who immediately before visiting one of the States is a resident of the other State and is temporarily present in the first-mentioned State for the primary purpose of: - a) full-time study at a recognized university, college or school in that first-mentioned State; or - b) securing training as a business apprentice, shall be exempt from tax in the first-mentioned State in respect of: - i) all remittances from abroad for the purpose of his maintenance, education or training, and - ii) any remuneration for personal services performed in the firstmentioned State for any taxable year in an amount that does not exceed 2,000 United States dollars or its equivalent in euro on January 1 of that taxable year. The benefits under this paragraph shall only extend for such period of time as may be reasonable or customarily required to effectuate the purpose of the visit. - 2 An individual who immediately before visiting one of the States is a resident of the other State and is temporarily present in the first-mentioned State for a period not exceeding three years for the purpose of study, research or training solely as a recipient of a grant, allowance or award from a scientific, educational, religious or charitable organization or under a technical assistance program entered into by one of the States, a political subdivision or a local authority thereof shall be exempt from tax in the first-mentioned State on: - a) the amount of such grant, allowance or award; and - b) any remuneration for personal services performed in the firstmentioned State for any taxable year provided such services are in connection with his study, research or training or are incidental thereto, in an amount that does not exceed 2,000 United States dollars or its equivalent in euro on January 1 of that taxable year. - 3 An individual may not claim the benefits of this Article or [Article 21](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel21) (Professors and Teachers) if, during the immediately preceding period, the individual claimed the benefits of such other Article. #### Article 23. Other Income - 1 Items of income of a resident of one of the States, wherever arising, not dealt with in the foregoing Articles of this Convention shall be taxable only in that State. - 2 The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply to income, other than income from real property as denned in [paragraph 2 of Article 6](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel6) (Income from Real Property), if the beneficial owner of the income, being a resident of one of the States, carries on business in the other State through a permanent establishment situated therein, or performs in that other State independent personal services from a fixed base situated therein, and the income is attributable to such permanent establishment or fixed base. In such case the provisions of [Article 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits) or [Article 15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services), as the case may be, shall apply. ### CHAPTER IV. ELIMINATION OF DOUBLE TAXATION #### Article 24. Basis of Taxation - 1 Notwithstanding any provision of the Convention except paragraph 2, each of the States may tax its residents and nationals as if the Convention had not come into effect. For this purpose, as regards the United States, the term national shall include a former citizen or long-term resident, not being a national of the Netherlands, whose loss of such United States status has as one of its principal purposes the avoidance of income tax, but only for a period of 10 years following such loss. - 2 The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not affect - a) the benefits conferred by one of the States under [paragraph 2 of Article 9](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel9) (Associated Enterprises), under [paragraphs 4, 7, 8 and 10 of Article 19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony), and under [Articles 25](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIV_Artikel25) (Methods of Elimination of Double Taxation), [28](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel28) (Non-Discrimination), and [29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure); and - b) the benefits conferred by one of the States under [Articles 20](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel20) (Government Service), [21](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel21) (Professors and Teachers), [22](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel22) (Students and Trainees), and [33](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel33) (Diplomatic Agents and Consular Officers), upon individuals who are neither citizens of that State, nor, in the case of the United States, lawful permanent residents of the United States. - 3 For the implementation of [paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits), [paragraph 7 of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), [paragraph 3 of Article 12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest), [paragraph 3 of Article 13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties), [paragraph 3 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains), [paragraph 1 of Article 15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services), and [paragraph 2 of Article 23](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel23) (Other Income), any income, gain or expense attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base during its existence is taxable or deductible in the State where such permanent establishment or fixed base is situated even if the payments are deferred until such permanent establishment or fixed base has ceased to exist. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall affect the application to such deferred payments of rules regarding the accrual of income and expenses according to the domestic law of each of the States. Gains from the alienation of personal property that at any time formed part of the business property of a permanent establishment or fixed base that a resident of one of the States has or had in the other State may be taxed by that other State only to the extent that the gain is attributable to the period in which the personal property in question formed part of the afore-mentioned business property. Such tax may be imposed on such gains at the time when realized and recognized under the laws of that other State, if that date is within 3 years of the date on which the property ceases to be part of the business property of the permanent establishment or fixed base. - 4 In the case of an item of income, profit or gain derived through a person that is fiscally transparent under the laws of either State, such item shall be considered to be derived by a resident of a State to the extent that the item is treated for the purposes of the taxation law of such State as the income, profit or gain of a resident. #### Article 25. Methods of Elimination of Double Taxation - 1 Notwithstanding the provisions of [paragraph 2 of Article 24](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIV_Artikel24) (Basis of Taxation), the Netherlands may include in the basis of taxation the items of income which under [paragraph 4 of Article 19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony) and [Article 20](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel20) (Government Service) are taxable only in the United States. - 2 Where a resident or national of the Netherlands derives items of income which according to [Article 6](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel6) (Income from Real Property), [Article 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits) insofar as such income is subject to United States tax, [paragraph 7 of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), [paragraph 3 of Article 12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest), [paragraph 3 of Article 13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties), [paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains), [Article 15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services) insofar as such income is subject to United States tax, [paragraph 1 of Article 16](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel16) (Dependent Personal Services), [paragraph 4 of Article 19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony), Article 20 (Government Service), and [paragraph 2 of Article 23](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel23) (Other Income) of this Convention are taxable in the United States and are included in the basis of taxation, the Netherlands shall exempt such items by allowing a reduction of its tax. This reduction shall be computed in conformity with the provisions of Netherlands law for the avoidance of double taxation. For that purpose the said items of income shall be deemed to be included in the total amount of the items of income which are exempt from Netherlands tax under those provisions. - 3 Further, the Netherlands shall allow a deduction from the Netherlands tax for the items of income which according to [paragraph 2 of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), [Article 17](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel17) (Directors' Fees), and [Article 18](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel18) (Artistes and Athletes) of the Convention may be taxed in the United States to the extent that these items are included in the basis of the taxation. The amount of this deduction shall be equal to - a) in the case of dividends which may be taxed in the United States according to [paragraph 2, subparagraph (a) of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), 5 percent of such dividends; - b) in the case of dividends which may be taxed in the United States according to [paragraph 2, subparagraph (b) of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), 15 percent of such dividends; - c) in the case of other dividends, which may be taxed in the United States according to [paragraph 4 of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), 15 percent of such dividends; and, - d) in the case of other items of income mentioned in this paragraph, the tax paid in the United States on such other items of income, but shall in no case exceed the amount of the reduction which would be allowed if the items of income so included were the sole items of income which are exempt from Netherlands tax under the provisions of Netherlands law for the avoidance of double taxation. - 4 In accordance with the provisions and subject to the limitations of the law of the United States (as it may be amended from time to time without changing the general principle hereof), the United States shall allow to a resident or national of the United States as a credit against the United States tax on income: - a) the appropriate amount of income tax paid or accrued to the Netherlands by or on behalf of such resident or national, except the income tax paid to the Netherlands in the cases referred to in [paragraph 9 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains) or in [paragraph 2 of Article 19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony); and - b) in the case of a United States company owning at least 10 percent of the voting stock of a company which is a resident of the Netherlands and from which the United States company receives dividends, the appropriate amount of income tax paid or accrued to the Netherlands by or on behalf of the distributing company with respect to the profits out of which the dividends are paid. Such appropriate amount shall be based upon the amount of income tax paid or accrued to the Netherlands, but the credit shall not exceed the limitations (for the purpose of limiting the credit to the United States tax on income from sources outside the United States) provided by United States law for the taxable year. For the purposes of this paragraph, the taxes referred to in [paragraphs l(a) and 2 of Article 2](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukI_Artikel2) (Taxes Covered) shall be considered income taxes. - 5 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 4 of this Article, the United States shall allow to a resident or a national of the United States, as a credit against the United States tax on income, the appropriate amount of profit share paid by or on behalf of such resident or national to the Netherlands. The appropriate amount shall be the product of (i) the creditable profit share income base and (ii) the maximum statutory United States tax rate applicable to such resident or national for such taxable year. For purposes of determining the appropriate amount, the following terms shall have the following meanings: - a) The creditable profit share income base is the excess of the income subject to the company income tax (excluding the income not subject to the profit share) that is derived from sources within the Netherlands (before deduction of the profit share due) over the creditable company income tax base. - b) The creditable company income tax base is the effective company income tax rate divided by the maximum statutory United States tax rate applicable to such resident or national for such taxable year, multiplied by the income subject to the company income tax (excluding the income not subject to the profit share) that is derived from sources within the Netherlands (before deduction of the profit share due). - c) The effective company income tax rate is the company income tax paid on the income subject to the company income tax (excluding the income not subject to the profit share) divided by the income subject to the company income tax, excluding the income not subject to the profit share and before deduction of the profit share due. The appropriate amount is also subject to any other limitations imposed by the law of the United States, as it may be amended from time to time, which apply to taxes creditable under sections 901 or 903 of the Internal Revenue Code for persons claiming benefits under this Convention. In applying such limitations to the company tax, the creditable company income tax base (as defined in (b), above) must be used for purposes of those limitations. Any profit share paid in excess of the appropriate amount only may be used as a credit in another taxable year, and only against United States tax on the creditable profit share income base (as defined in (a), above). If a credit is claimed in respect of the profit share, the taxpayer may not claim a deduction for United States taxable income purposes with respect to any foreign taxes for which a credit against United States tax on income may be claimed under sections 901 or 903 of the Internal Revenue Code, or profit share, paid or accrued in such year. No credit shall be allowed under paragraph 4 of this Article for any Netherlands tax for which a credit is claimed under the provisions of this paragraph. - 6 Where a United States citizen is a resident of the Netherlands: - a) with respect to items of income not exempt from Netherlands tax under paragraph 2, nor dealt with in paragraph 7 of this Article, that under the provisions of this Convention are exempt from United States tax or that are subject to a reduced rate of United States tax when derived by a resident of the Netherlands who is not a United States citizen, the Netherlands shall allow as a credit against Netherlands tax, subject to the provisions of Netherlands tax law regarding credit for foreign tax, only the tax paid, if any, that the United States may impose under the provisions of this Convention, other than taxes that may be imposed solely by reason of citizenship under [paragraph 1 of Article 24](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIV_Artikel24) (Basis of Taxation); - b) for purposes of computing United States tax under subparagraph (a), the United States shall allow as a credit against United States tax the income tax paid to the Netherlands after the credit referred to in subparagraph (a); the credit so allowed shall not reduce the portion of the United States tax that is creditable against the Netherlands tax in accordance with subparagraph (a); and - c) for the exclusive purpose of relieving double taxation in the United States under subparagraph (b), items of income referred to in subparagraph (a) shall be deemed to arise in the Netherlands to the extent necessary to avoid double taxation of such income under subparagraph (b). - 7 Where a resident of one of the States derives gains or a remuneration or a lump sum which may be taxed in the other State in accordance with [paragraph 9 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains), or with [paragraph 2 of Article 19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony), that other State shall allow a deduction from its tax on such gains, remuneration or lump sum. The amount of this deduction shall be equal to the tax levied in the first-mentioned State on the said gains, remuneration or lump sum, but shall in no case exceed that part of the income tax, as computed before the deduction is given, which is attributable to the said gains, remuneration or lump sum. For the exclusive purpose of relieving double taxation in the United States under this paragraph, items of income referred to in this paragraph shall be deemed to arise in the Netherlands to the extent necessary to avoid double taxation of such income under this paragraph. - 8 Finally, the Netherlands shall allow a deduction from the Netherlands tax for the items of income which according to [paragraph 8 of Article 12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest) and [paragraph 6 of Article 13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties) may be taxed in the United States to the extent that these items are included in the basis of taxation and are not exempt from tax in the Netherlands as profits of a permanent establishment under the Netherlands national taxing regime or under any bilateral or multilateral provision for the avoidance of double taxation agreed to by the Netherlands. The amount of this deduction shall be equal to: - a) in the case of interest which may be taxed in the United States according to [paragraph 8 of Article 12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest), 15 percent of such interest; - b) in the case of royalties which may be taxed in the United States according to [paragraph 6 of Article 13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties), 15 percent of such royalties, but shall in no case exceed the amount of the reduction which would be allowed if the items of income so included were the sole items of income which are exempt from Netherlands tax under the provisions of Netherlands law for the avoidance of double taxation. ### CHAPTER V. SPECIAL PROVISIONS #### Article 26. Limitation on benefits - 1 Except as otherwise provided in this Article, a resident of one of the States that derives income from the other State shall be entitled to all the benefits of this Convention otherwise accorded to residents of a State only if such resident is a “qualified person” as defined in paragraph 2 of this Article and satisfies any other specified conditions for the obtaining of such benefits. - 2 A resident of one of the States is a qualified person for a taxable year only if such resident is either: - a) an individual; - b) a State, or a political subdivision or local authority thereof; - c) a company, if - (i) the principal class of its shares (and any disproportionate class of shares) is listed on a recognized stock exchange specified in clauses i) or ii) of subparagraph a) of paragraph 8 of this Article and is regularly traded on one or more recognized stock exchanges, unless the company has no substantial presence in the State of which it is a resident; or - (ii) shares representing at least 50 percent of the aggregate voting power and value (and at least 50 percent of any disproportionate class of shares) of the company are owned directly or indirectly by five or fewer companies entitled to benefits under clause i) of this subparagraph, provided that, in the case of indirect ownership, each intermediate owner is a resident of either State; - d) a person described in [Article 35](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel35) (Exempt Pension Trusts) of this Convention, provided that: - (i) more than 50 percent of the person's beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals who are residents of either State; or - (ii) the organization sponsoring such person is entitled to the benefits of the Convention pursuant to this Article; - e) a not-for-profit organization not described in subparagraph d) that, by virtue of such status, is generally exempt from income taxation in its State of residence; or - f) a person, other than an individual or a company that would qualify for benefits under clause i) of subparagraph c) but for the fact that it has no substantial presence in the State of which it is a resident, if: - (i) on at least half the days of the taxable year persons that are qualified persons by reason of subparagraphs a), b), clause i) of subparagraph c), or subparagraphs d) or e) of this paragraph own, directly or indirectly, shares or other beneficial interests representing at least 50 percent of the aggregate voting power and value (and at least 50 percent of any disproportionate class of shares) of the person, and - (ii) less than 50 percent of the person's gross income for that taxable year is paid or accrued, directly or indirectly, to persons who are not residents of either State in the form of payments that are deductible for the purposes of the taxes covered by this Convention in the State of which the person is a resident (but not including arm's length payments in the ordinary course of business for services or tangible property and payments in respect of financial obligations to a bank, provided that where such a bank is not a resident of a State such payment is attributable to a permanent establishment of that bank located in one of the States). - 3 Notwithstanding that a company that is a resident of a State may not be a qualified person, it shall be entitled to all the benefits of this Convention otherwise accorded to residents of a State with respect to an item of income if it satisfies any other specified conditions for the obtaining of such benefits and: - a) shares representing at least 95 percent of the aggregate voting power and value (and at least 50 percent of any disproportionate class of shares) of the company are owned, directly or indirectly, by seven or fewer persons who are equivalent beneficiaries; and - b) less than 50 percent of the company's gross income for the taxable year in which the item of income arises is paid or accrued, directly or indirectly, to persons who are not equivalent beneficiaries, in the form of payments that are deductible for the purposes of the taxes covered by this Convention in the State of which the company is a resident (but not including arm's length payments in the ordinary course of business for services or tangible property and payments in respect of financial obligations to a bank, provided that where such a bank is not a resident of a State such payment is attributable to a permanent establishment of that bank located in one of the States). - 4 - a) Notwithstanding that a resident of a State may not be a qualified person, it shall be entitled to all the benefits of this Convention otherwise accorded to residents of a State with respect to an item of income derived from the other State, if the resident is engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business in the first-mentioned State (other than the activities of making or managing investments for the resident's own account, unless these activities are banking, insurance or securities dealing carried on by a bank, insurance company or registered securities dealer), the income derived from the other State is derived in connection with, or is incidental to, that trade or business and that resident satisfies any other specified conditions for the obtaining of such benefits. - b) If a resident of one of the States or any of its associated enterprises carries on a trade or business activity in the other State which gives rise to an item of income, subparagraph a) of this paragraph shall apply to such item only if the trade or business activity in the first-mentioned State is substantial in relation to the trade or business activity in the other State. - c) In determining whether a person is engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business in a State under subparagraph a) of this paragraph, activities conducted by a partnership in which that person is a partner and activities conducted by persons connected to such person shall be deemed to be conducted by such person. A person shall be connected to another if one possesses at least 50 percent of the beneficial interest in the other (or, in the case of a company, shares representing at least 50 percent of the aggregate voting power and value of the company or of the beneficial equity interest in the company) or another person possesses, directly or indirectly, at least 50 percent of the beneficial interest (or, in the case of a company, shares representing at least 50 percent of the aggregate voting power and value of the company or of the beneficial equity interest in the company) in each person. In any case, a person shall be considered to be connected to another if, on the basis of all the facts and circumstances, one has control of the other or both are under the control of the same person or persons. - 5 A person that is a resident of a State shall also be entitled to all the benefits of this Convention otherwise accorded to residents of a State if that person functions as a headquarters company for a multinational corporate group and that resident satisfies any other specified conditions for the obtaining of such benefits. A person shall be considered a headquarters company for this purpose only if: - a) it provides a substantial portion of the overall supervision and administration of the group, which may include, but cannot be principally, group financing; - b) the corporate group consists of corporations resident in, and engaged in an active business in, at least five countries, and the business activities carried on in each of the five countries (or five groupings of countries) generate at least 10 percent of the gross income of the group; - c) the business activities carried on in any one country other than the State of residence of the headquarters company generate less than 50 percent of the gross income of the group; - d) no more than 25 percent of its gross income is derived from the other State; - e) it has, and exercises, independent discretionary authority to carry out the functions referred to in subparagraph a); - f) it is subject to the same income taxation rules in its country of residence as persons described in paragraph 4; and - g) the income derived in the other State either is derived in connection with, or is incidental to, the active business referred to in subparagraph b). If the gross income requirements of subparagraphs b), c), or d) of this paragraph are not fulfilled, they will be deemed to be fulfilled if the required ratios are met when averaging the gross income of the preceding four years. - 6 A person, resident of one of the States, which derives from the other State income mentioned in [Article 8](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel8) (Shipping and Air Transport) and which is not entitled to the benefits of this Convention because of the foregoing paragraphs, shall nevertheless be entitled to the benefits of this Convention with respect to such income if: - a) more than 50 percent of the beneficial interest in such person (or in the case of a company, more than 50 percent of the value of the stock of such company) is owned, directly or indirectly, by qualified persons or individuals who are residents of a third state; or - b) in the case of a company, the stock of such company is primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market in a third state, provided that such third state grants an exemption under similar terms for profits as mentioned in [Article 8](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel8) of this Convention to citizens and corporations of the other State either under its national law or in common agreement with that other State or under a Convention between that third state and the other State. - 7 A person resident of one of the States, who is not entitled to some or all of the benefits of this Convention because of the foregoing paragraphs, may, nevertheless, be granted benefits of this Convention if the competent authority of the State in which the income in question arises so determines. In making such determination, the competent authority shall take into account as its guidelines whether the establishment, acquisition or maintenance of such person or the conduct of its operations has or had as one of its principal purposes the obtaining of benefits under this Convention. The competent authority of the State in which the income arises will consult with the competent authority of the other State before denying benefits of the Convention under this paragraph. - 8 For the purposes of this Article the following rules and definitions shall apply: - a) the term ``recognized stock exchange” means: - (i) the NASDAQ System and any stock exchange registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a national securities exchange under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; - (ii) the Amsterdam Stock Exchange and any other stock exchange subject to regulation by the Authority for the Financial Markets (or its successor) in the Netherlands; - (iii) the Irish Stock Exchange, the Swiss Stock Exchange and the stock exchanges of Brussels, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Johannesburg, London, Madrid, Milan, Paris, Stockholm, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto and Vienna; and - (iv) any other stock exchange which the competent authorities agree to recognize for the purposes of this Article; - b) - (i) the term “principal class of shares” means the ordinary or common shares of the company, provided that such class of shares represents the majority of the voting power and value of the company. If no single class of ordinary or common shares represents the majority of the aggregate voting power and value of the company, the “principal class of shares” is that class or those classes that in the aggregate represent a majority of the aggregate voting power and value of the company; - (ii) the term “shares” shall include depository receipts thereof or trust certificates thereof; - c) the term “disproportionate class of shares” means any class of shares of a company resident in one of the States that entitles the shareholder to disproportionately higher participation, through dividends, redemption payments or otherwise, in the earnings generated in the other State by particular assets or activities of the company; - d) a company has no substantial presence in the State of which it is a resident if: - (i) - A) the aggregate volume of trading in such company's stock on recognized stock exchanges located in the other State is greater than the aggregate volume of trading in its stock on recognized stock exchanges in its primary economic zone, or - B) the company is not traded on any recognized stock exchange located in the primary economic zone of the State of which the company is a resident, or trading on such exchange or exchanges constitutes less than 10 percent of total worldwide trading in such company's stock; and - (ii) the company's primary place of management and control is not in the State of which it is a resident; - e) in making the determinations in subparagraph d), - (i) for purposes of clause i) thereof, the company may make the determination using average trading volumes for the three preceding taxable years; - (ii) the primary economic zone of the Netherlands includes the member states of the European Union or the European Economic Area. The primary economic zone of the United States includes the states party to the North American Free Trade Agreement; and - (iii) the company's primary place of management and control will be in the State of which it is a resident only if executive officers and senior management employees exercise day-to-day responsibility for more of the strategic, financial and operational policy decision making for the company (including its direct and indirect subsidiaries) in that State than in any other state and the staffs conduct more of the day-to-day activities necessary for preparing and making those decisions in that State than in any other state. - f) an equivalent beneficiary is a resident of a member state of the European Union or of a European Economic Area state or of a party to the North American Free Trade Agreement but only if that resident: - (i) - A) would be entitled to all the benefits of a comprehensive convention for the avoidance of double taxation between any member state of the European Union or a European Economic Area state or any party to the North American Free Trade Agreement and the State from which the benefits of this Convention are claimed under provisions analogous to subparagraph a), b), clause i) of subparagraph c) or subparagraph d) or e) of paragraph 2 of this Article, provided that if such convention does not contain a comprehensive limitation on benefits article, the person would be a qualified person under subparagraph a), b), clause i) of subparagraph c) or subparagraph d) or e) of paragraph 2 of this Article if such person were a resident of one of the States under [Article 4](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukII_Artikel4) (Resident) of this Convention; and - B) with respect to income referred to in [Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), [11](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel11) (Branch Tax), [12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest) or [13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties) of this Convention, would be entitled under such convention to a rate of tax with respect to the particular class of income for which benefits are being claimed under this Convention that is at least as low as the rate applicable under this Convention; or - (ii) is a resident of a State that is a qualified person by reason of subparagraph a), b), clause i) of subparagraph c) or subparagraph d) or e) of paragraph 2 of this Article. For the purposes of applying paragraph 3 of [Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends) in order to determine whether a person, owning shares, directly or indirectly, in the company claiming the benefits of this Convention, is an equivalent beneficiary, such person shall be deemed to hold the same voting power in the company paying the dividend as the company claiming the benefits holds in such company; - g) with respect to dividends, interest or royalties arising in the Netherlands and beneficially owned by a company that is a resident of the United States, a company that is a resident of a member state of the European Union will be treated as satisfying the requirements of subparagraph f) i) B) for purposes of determining whether such United States resident is entitled to benefits under this paragraph if a payment of dividends, interest or royalties arising in the Netherlands and paid directly to such resident of a member state of the European Union would have been exempt from tax pursuant to any directive of the European Union, notwithstanding that the income tax convention between the Netherlands and that other member state of the European Union would provide for a higher rate of tax with respect to such payment than the rate of tax applicable to such United States company under [Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), [12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest), or [13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties) of this Convention; - h) for the purposes of paragraph 2 of this Article, the shares in a class of shares are considered to be regularly traded on one or more recognized stock exchanges in a taxable year if the aggregate number of shares of that class traded on such stock exchange or exchanges during the twelve months ending on the day before the beginning of that taxable year is at least six percent of the average number of shares outstanding in that class during that twelve-month period. #### Article 27. Offshore Activities - 1 The provisions of this Article shall apply notwithstanding any other provision of this Convention. However, this Article shall not apply where offshore activities of a person constitute for that person a permanent establishment under the provisions of [Article 5](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukII_Artikel5) (Permanent Establishment) or a fixed base under the provisions of [Article 15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services). - 2 In this Article the term “offshore activities” means activities which are carried on offshore in connection with the exploration or exploitation of the sea bed and its sub-soil and their natural resources, situated in one of the States. - 3 An enterprise of one of the States which carries on offshore activities in the other State shall, subject to paragraph 4, be deemed to be carrying on, in respect of those activities, business in that other State through a permanent establishment situated therein, unless the offshore activities in question are carried on in the other State for a period or periods not exceeding in the aggregate 30 days in a calendar year. For the purposes of this paragraph: - a) where an enterprise carrying on offshore activities in the other State is associated with another enterprise and that other enterprise continues, as part of the same project, the same offshore activities that are or were being carried on by the first-mentioned enterprise, and the afore-mentioned activities carried on by both enterprises - when added together - exceed a period of 30 days, then each enterprise shall be deemed to be carrying on its activities for a period exceeding 30 days in a calendar year; - b) an enterprise shall be regarded as associated with another enterprise if one holds directly or indirectly at least one third of the capital of the other enterprise or if a person holds directly or indirectly at least one third of the capital of both enterprises. - 4 However, for the purposes of paragraph 3, the term “offshore activities” shall be deemed not to include: - a) one or any combination of the activities mentioned in [paragraph 4 of Article 5](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukII_Artikel5) (Permanent Establishment); - b) towing or anchor handling by ships primarily designed for that purpose and any other activities performed by such ships; or - c) the transport of supplies or personnel by ships or aircraft in international traffic. - 5 A resident of one of the States who carries on offshore activities in the other State, which consist of professional services or other activities of an independent character, shall be deemed to be performing those activities from a fixed base in the other State if the offshore activities in question last for a continuous period of 30 days or more. - 6 Salaries, wages and other similar remuneration derived by a resident of one of the States in respect of an employment connected with offshore activities carried on through a permanent establishment in the other State may, to the extent that the employment is exercised offshore in that other State, be taxed in that other State. - 7 Where documentary evidence is produced that tax has been paid in the United States on the items of income that may be taxed in the United States according to [Article 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits) or [Article 15](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel15) (Independent Personal Services) in connection with respectively paragraph 3 or paragraph 5 of this Article, and according to paragraph 6 of this Article, the Netherlands shall allow a reduction of its tax, which shall be computed in conformity with the rules laid down in [paragraph 2 of Article 25](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIV_Artikel25) (Methods of Elimination of Double Taxation). #### Article 28. Non-discrimination - 1 Nationals of one of the States shall not be subjected in the other State to any taxation or any requirement connected therewith, which is other or more burdensome than the taxation and connected requirements to which nationals of that other State in the same circumstances are or may be subjected. This provision shall, notwithstanding the provisions of [Article 1](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukI_Artikel1) (General Scope), also apply to persons who are not residents of one or both of the States. However, for the purposes of United States tax, a United States national who is not a resident of the United States and a Netherlands national who is not a resident of the United States are not in the same circumstances. - 2 The taxation on a permanent establishment which an enterprise of one of the States has in the other State shall not be less favourably levied in that other State than the taxation levied on enterprises of that other State carrying on the same activities. This provision shall not be construed as obliging one of the States to grant to residents of the other State any personal allowances, reliefs, and reductions for taxation purposes on account of civil status or family responsibilities which it grants to its own residents. - 3 Except where the provisions of [paragraph 1 of Article 9](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel9) (Associated Enterprises), [paragraph 5 of Article 12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest), or [paragraph 4 of Article 13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties) apply, interest, royalties and other disbursements paid by a resident of one of the States to a resident of the other State shall, for the purposes of determining the taxable profits of the first-mentioned resident, be deductible under the same conditions as if they had been paid to a resident of the first-mentioned State. - 4 Enterprises of one of the States, the capital of which is wholly or partly owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by one or more residents of the other State, shall not be subjected in the first-mentioned State to any taxation or any requirement connected therewith which is other or more burdensome than the taxation and connected requirements to which other similar enterprises of the first-mentioned State are or may be subjected. - 5 Nothing in this Article shall be construed to prevent or limit the application by either State of its tax on branch profits described in [Article 11](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel11) (Branch Tax). - 6 The provisions of this Article shall, notwithstanding the provisions of [Article 2](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukI_Artikel2) (Taxes Covered), apply to taxes of every kind and description imposed by one of the States or a political subdivision or local authority thereof. #### Article 29. Mutual Agreement Procedure - 1 Where a person considers that the actions of one or both of the States result or will result for him in taxation not in accordance with the provisions of this Convention, he may, irrespective of the remedies provided by the domestic law of those States, present his case to the competent authority of the State of which he is a resident or national. - 2 The competent authority shall endeavour, if the objection appears to it to be justified and if it is not itself able to arrive at a satisfactory solution, to resolve the case by mutual agreement with the competent authority of the other State, with a view to the avoidance of taxation which is not in accordance with the Convention. Any agreement reached shall be implemented notwithstanding any time limits or other procedural limitations in the domestic law of the States, provided that the competent authority of the other State has received notification that such a case exists within six years from the end of the taxable year to which the case relates. - 3 The competent authorities of the States shall endeavour to resolve by mutual agreement any difficulties or doubts arising as to the interpretation or application of the Convention. In particular the competent authorities of the States may agree: - a) to the same attribution of income, deductions, credits, or allowances of an enterprise of one of the States to its permanent establishment situated in the other State; - b) to the same allocation of income, deductions, credits, or allowances between persons; - c) to the same characterization of particular items of income; - d) to the same application of source rules with respect to particular items of income; - e) to a common meaning of a term; - f) to increases in any specific amounts referred to in the Convention to reflect economic or monetary developments; and - g) to the application of the provisions of domestic law regarding penalties, fines, and interest in a manner consistent with the purposes of the Convention. They may also consult together for the elimination of double taxation in cases not provided for in the Convention. - 4 The competent authorities of the States may communicate with each other directly for the purpose of reaching an agreement in the sense of the preceding paragraphs. - 5 If any difficulty or doubt arising as to the interpretation or application of this Convention cannot be resolved by the competent authorities in a mutual agreement procedure pursuant to the previous paragraphs of this Article, the case may, if both competent authorities and the taxpayer(s) agree, be submitted for arbitration, provided the taxpayer agrees in writing to be bound by the decision of the arbitration board. The decision of the arbitration board in a particular case shall be binding on both States with respect to that case. The provisions of this paragraph shall have effect after the States have so agreed through the exchange of diplomatic notes. - 6 If the competent authority of one of the States becomes aware that the law of one of the States is or may be applied in a manner that may impede the full implementation of this Convention, that competent authority shall inform the competent authority of the other State in a timely manner. At the request of one of the States, the competent authorities shall consult with each other with a view to establishing a basis for the full implementation of this Convention. The consultations described in this paragraph should begin within six months of the date on which the competent authority of the first-mentioned State informed the competent authority of the other State. #### Article 30. Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance - 1 The competent authorities of the States shall exchange such information as is necessary for carrying out the provisions of this Convention or of the domestic laws of the States concerning taxes covered by the Convention insofar as the taxation thereunder is not contrary to the Convention, including for the assessment, collection, administration, enforcement, prosecution before an administrative authority or initiation of prosecution before a judicial body, or determination of appeals with respect to the taxes covered by the Convention. The exchange of information is not restricted by [Article 1](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukI_Artikel1) (General Scope). Any information received by one of the States shall be treated as secret in the same manner as information obtained under the domestic laws of that State and shall be disclosed only to persons or authorities (including courts and administrative bodies) involved in the above functions in relation to taxes covered by the Convention. Such persons or authorities shall use the information only for such purposes. They may disclose the information in public court proceedings or in judicial decisions. A State may use information obtained under this Convention as evidence before a criminal court only if prior authorization has been given by the competent authority which has supplied the information. However, the competent authorities may mutually agree to waive the condition of prior authorization. - 2 If information is requested by one of the States in accordance with this Article, the other State shall obtain the information to which the request relates in the same manner and to the same extent as if the tax of the first-mentioned State were the tax of that other State and were being imposed by the other State. If specifically requested by the competent authority of a State, the competent authority of the other State shall endeavor to provide information under this Article in the form of depositions of witnesses and authenticated copies of unedited original documents (including books, papers, statements, records, accounts, and writings), to the same extent such depositions and documents can be obtained under the laws and administrative practices of that other State with respect to its own taxes. - 3 The States may release to the arbitration board, established under the provisions of [paragraph 5 of Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure), such information as is necessary for carrying out the arbitration procedure. Such release of information shall be subject to the provisions of [Article 32](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel32) (Limitation of [Articles 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) and [31](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel31)) and to paragraph 2 of this Article. The members of the arbitration board shall be subject to the limitations on disclosure described in paragraph 1 of this Article with respect to any information so released. #### Article 31. Assistance and Support in Collection - 1 The States undertake to lend assistance and support to each other in the collection of the taxes which are the subject of the present Convention, together with interest, costs, and additions to the taxes and fines not being of a penal character. - 2 In the case of applications for enforcement of taxes, revenue claims of each of the States which have been finally determined may be accepted for enforcement by the other State and collected in that State in accordance with the laws applicable to the enforcement and collection of its own taxes. The State to which application is made shall not be required to enforce executory measures for which there is no provision in the law of the State making the application. - 3 Any application shall be accompanied by documents establishing that under the laws of the State making the application the taxes have been finally determined. - 4 The assistance provided for in this Article shall not be accorded with respect to the citizens, corporations, or other entities of the State to which application is made, except in cases where the exemption or reduced rate of tax granted under the Convention to such citizens, corporations or other entities has, according to mutual agreement between the competent authorities of the States, been enjoyed by persons not entitled to such benefits. #### Article 32. Limitation of [articles 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) and [31](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel31) - 1 In no case shall the provisions of [Articles 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) (Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance) and [31](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel31) (Assistance and Support in Collection) be construed so as to impose on one of the States the obligation: - a) to carry out administrative measures at variance with the laws and administrative practice of that or of the other State; - b) to supply information which is not obtainable under the laws or in the normal course of the administration of that or of the other State; - c) to supply information which would disclose any trade, business, industrial, commercial, or professional secret or trade process, or information, the disclosure of which would be contrary to public policy. - 2 Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the competent authority of each State shall have the authority to obtain and provide information held by financial institutions, nominees or persons acting in an agency or fiduciary capacity or information about persons holding interests, including bearer shares, in another person, regardless of any laws or practices of the State that might otherwise preclude the obtaining of such information. - 3 The provisions of this Convention shall not impose on a State the obligation to obtain or provide information which would reveal confidential communications between a client and an attorney, solicitor or other admitted legal representative where such communications are: - a) produced for the purposes of seeking or providing legal advice; or - b) produced for the purposes of use in existing or contemplated legal proceedings. #### Article 33. Diplomatic Agents and Consular Officers - 1 Nothing in this Convention shall affect the fiscal privileges of diplomatic agents or consular officers under the general rules of international law or under the provisions of special agreements. - 2 For the purposes of the Convention an individual, who is a member of a diplomatic or consular mission of one of the States in the other State or in a third state and who is a national of the sending State, shall be deemed to be a resident of the sending State, but only if he is subjected therein to the same obligations in respect of taxes on income as are residents of that State. - 3 The Convention shall not apply to international organizations, to organs or officials thereof and to individuals who are members of a diplomatic or consular mission of a third State, being present in one of the States and who are not subjected in either State to the same obligations in respect of taxes on income as are residents of that State. #### Article 34. Regulations - 1 The competent authorities of the States may by mutual agreement settle the mode of application of [Articles 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), [11](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel11) (Branch Tax), [12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest), [13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties) and [26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits). - 2 With respect to the provisions of this Convention relating to exchange of information and mutual assistance in the collection of taxes, the competent authorities may, by common agreement, prescribe rules concerning matters of procedure, forms of application and replies thereto, conversion of currency, disposition of amounts collected, minimum amounts subject to collection, and related matters. - 3 The competent authorities of each of the States, in accordance with the practices of that State, may prescribe regulations necessary to carry out the other provisions of this Convention. - 4 Where tax has been levied at source in excess of the amount of tax chargeable under the provisions of [Articles 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), [12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest) or [13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties), applications for the refund of the excess amount of tax must be lodged with the competent authority of the State having levied the tax, within a period of three years after the expiration of the calendar year in which the tax has been levied. #### Article 35. Exempt Pension Trusts - 1 Subject to the provisions of paragraph 2, income referred to in [Articles 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends) and [12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest) derived by a trust, company or other organization constituted and operated exclusively to administer or provide benefits under one or more funds or plans established to provide pension, retirement or other employee benefits shall be exempt from tax in one of the States if it is a resident of the other State according to the laws of that other State and its income is generally exempt from tax in that other State. - 2 The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply with respect to the income of a trust, company or other organization from carrying on a trade or business or from a related person other than a person referred to in paragraph 1. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall also not apply with respect to dividends paid by a person resident in the United States that is a Real Estate Investment Trust from gains realized on the disposition of real property situated in the United States. #### Article 36. Exempt Organizations - 1 A trust, company or other organization that is a resident of one of the States according to the laws of that State and that is operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, educational, or public purposes shall be exempt from tax by the other State in respect of items of income, if and to the extent that - a) such trust, company or other organization is exempt from tax in the first-mentioned State, and - b) such trust, company or other organization would be exempt from tax in the other State in respect of such items of income if it were organized, and carried on all its activities, in that other State. - 2 The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply with respect to the income of a trust, company or other organization from carrying on a trade or business or from a related person other than a person referred to in paragraph 1. - 3 The competent authorities of the States shall in mutual agreement develop procedures for implementing this Article. ### CHAPTER VI. FINAL PROVISIONS #### Article 37. Entry into Force - 1 This Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the later of the dates on which the respective Governments have notified each other in writing that the formalities constitutionally required in their respective States have been complied with, and its provisions shall have effect for taxable years and periods beginning, or in the case of taxes payable at source, payments made, on or after the first day of January in the year following the date of entry into force. - 2 Notwithstanding paragraph 1, where any greater relief from tax would have been afforded to a person entitled to the benefits of the [Convention](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0005531) signed at Washington on April 29, 1948, between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United States of America with respect to taxes on income and certain other taxes, modified as set forth in the Protocol of Exchange of Instruments of Ratification signed at Washington on December 1, 1948, and subsequently modified and supplemented by the Supplementary Convention signed at Washington on December 30, 1965 (“prior Convention”), under that Convention than under this Convention, the prior Convention shall, at the election of such person, continue to have effect in its entirety for a twelve-month period from the date on which the provisions of this Convention would otherwise have effect under paragraph 1. - 3 Subject to the provisions of paragraph 4, the prior [Convention](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0005531) shall cease to have effect when the provisions of this Convention take effect in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2. - 4 This Convention shall not affect any Agreement in force extending the [Convention](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0005531) signed at Washington on April 29, 1948, in accordance with [Article XXVII thereof](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0005531&artikel=XXVII). #### Article 38. Termination This Convention shall remain in force until terminated by one of the States. Either State may terminate the Convention, through diplomatic channels, by giving notice of termination at least six months before the end of any calendar year after the expiration of a period of five years from the date of its entry into force. In such event the Convention shall cease to have effect for taxable years and periods beginning, or in the case of taxes payable at source, payments made, after the end of the calendar year in which the notice of termination has been given. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, duly authorized thereto, have signed this Convention. DONE at Washington this eighteenth day of December 1992, in duplicate, in the Netherlands and English languages, the two texts being equally authentic. For the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands: (sd.) J. H. MEESMAN For the Government of the United States of America: (sd.) EUGENE J. MCALLISTER #### Nr. I DEPARTEMENT OF STATE WASHINGTON Excellency, I have the honor to refer to the Convention signed today between the United States of America and the Kingdom of the Netherlands for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and to propose on behalf of the Government of the United States of America the following: Both Governments confirm that their respective countries recognize the principle that the Convention, once in force, is binding upon both parties and muest be performed by them in good faith and in accordance with generally accepted rules of international law. The Governments further confirm their recognition that they should avoid enactment or interpretation of legislation or other domestic measures that would prevent the performance of their obligations under the Convention. On the other hand, both governments recognize the possibility of significant changes in the national taxation laws which may affect implementation of the Convention. The Governments agree in principle that in such a case an appropriate amendment of the Convention might be necessary. Whether and to the extent to which such an amendment is necessary and acceptable will be determined in consultation and negotiation between the two Governments. Furthermore, the Government of the United States gives its assurances to the Government of The Netherlands, that, in the event a state or local government in the United States seeks to impose a tax on the income of airline or shipping companies resident in The Netherlands in circumstances where the Convention would preclude a Federal income tax on that income, the United States Government will contact the state or local government seeking to impose the tax in an effort to presuade that government to refrain from imposing the tax. Finally, in the course of the negotiations leading to the conclusion of the Convention signed today, the negotiators developed and agreed upon a memorandum of understanding intended to give guidance both to the taxpayers and the tax authorities of our two countries in interpreting various provisions contained in the Convention. It is my Government's view that as we both gain experience in administrering the Convention competent authorities may in the context of a mutual agreement procedure under [Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) of the Convention develop and publish amendments to the understandings and interpretations laid down in the attached memorandum of understanding. If the above-mentioned understandings and the interpretation of the various provisions laid down in the attached memorandum of understanding meet with the approval of the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, this Note and your Note in reply thereto will consitute a common and binding understanding by our Governments of the Convention and of the contents and the role of the memorandum of understanding relating to the Convention. Accept, Your Excellency, the expression of my highest consideration. For the Secretary of State: (w.g.) EUGENE J. MCALLISTER His Excellency Hans Meesman Ambassador of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. #### Nr. II Washington D.C., December 18, 1992 Mr.Secretary I have the honour to confirm receipt of your Note of today's date which reads as follows: [Red: (zoals in Nr. I)] I have the honour to inform you, that my Government agrees to the above. Accept, Your Excellency, the expression of my highest consideration. (sd.) J. H. MEESMAN Hans Meesman Ambassador of the Kingdom of the Netherlands The Honorable Lawrence S. Eagleburger Secretary of State of the United States of America #### Understanding regarding the Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United States of America for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income, signed on December 18, 1992 and amended by protocols signed on October 13, 1993 and March 8, 2004 #### I. In reference to paragraph 1 of [Article 4](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukII_Artikel4) (Resident) - a) It is understood that for purposes of the [Convention](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1), the Government of one of the States, its political subdivisions or local authorities are to be considered as residents of that State. - b) It is understood that a company that is or would be a resident of a State pursuant to that State's domestic law will not be treated as a resident of that State for purposes of the [Convention](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1) if it is treated as a resident of a third state pursuant to an income tax convention between that State and the third state. #### II. In reference to paragraph 4 of [Article 4](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukII_Artikel4) (Resident) It is understood that, if a company is a resident of the Netherlands under [paragraph 1 of Article 4](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukII_Artikel4) (Resident) and, because of the application of Section 269B of the Internal Revenue Code, such company is also a resident of the United States under paragraph 1 of Article 4, the question of its residency for the purposes of the application of this [Convention](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1) shall be subject to a mutual agreement procedure as laid down in paragraph 4 of Article 4. #### III. In reference to [Article 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits) It is understood that with respect to [paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 7](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel7) (Business Profits), where an enterprise of one of the States carries on business in the other State through a permanent establishment situated therein, the profits of that permanent establishment shall not be determined on the basis of the total income of the enterprise, but shall be determined only on the basis of that portion of the income of the enterprise that is attributable to the actual activity of the permanent establishment in respect of such business. Specifically, in the case of contracts for the survey, supply, installation or construction of industrial, commercial or scientific equipment or premises, or of public works, when the enterprise has a permanent establishment, the profits attributable to such permanent establishment shall not be determined on the basis of the total amount of the contract, but shall be determined on the basis only of that part of the contract that is effectively carried out by the permanent establishment. The profits related to that part of the contract that is carried out by the head office of the enterprise shall not be taxable in the State in which the permanent establishment is situated. #### IV. In reference to [Article 9](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel9) (Associated Enterprises), [Article 12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest) and [Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure) Nothing in [paragraph 1 of Article 9](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel9) (Associated Enterprises) or [paragraph 5 of Article 12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest) shall prevent either State from determining the appropriate amount of interest deduction of an enterprise not only by reference to the amount of interest with respect to any particular debt-claim but also by reference to the overall amount of debt capital of the enterprise. In the context of a mutual agreement procedure under [Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure), the amount of the interest deduction shall be determined in a manner consistent with the principles of paragraph 1 of Article 9, by reference to conditions in commercial or financial relations which prevail between independent enterprises dealing at arm's length. Those principles are more fully examined and explained in OECD publications regarding “thin capitalization”. #### V. In reference to [Article 9](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel9) (Associated Enterprises) and [Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure) In accordance with paragraph 3 of [Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure) the competent authorities shall endeavor to resolve by mutual agreement any case of double taxation arising by reason of an allocation of income, deductions, credits or allowances caused by the application of internal law regarding thin capitalization, earnings stripping, or transfer pricing, or other provisions potentially giving rise to double taxation. In this mutual agreement procedure, the proper allocation of income, deductions, credits or allowances under the [Convention](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1) will be determined in a manner consistent with the principles of paragraph 1 of [Article 9](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel9) (Associated Enterprises) by reference to conditions in commercial or financial relations that prevail between independent enterprises dealing at arm's length. Consistent with the mutual agreement procedures of other income tax conventions, including those entered by both States, a procedure under Article 29 (Mutual Agreement Procedure) concerning an adjustment in the allocation of income, deductions, credits or allowances by one of the States might result either in a correlative adjustment by the other State or in a full or partial readjustment by the first-mentioned State of its original adjustment. #### VI. In reference to [subparagraph 2 a) and paragraph 6 of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends) It is understood that a beneficial owner of the dividends, who holds depository receipts or trust certificates evidencing beneficial ownership of the shares in lieu of the shares themselves in the company in question, may also claim the treaty benefits of [subparagraph 2 a) of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends). In addition, it is understood that where a person loans shares (or other rights the income from which is subject to the same taxation treatment as income from shares) and receives from the borrower an obligation to pay an amount equivalent to any dividend distribution made with respect to the shares or other rights loaned during the term of such loan, such person shall be treated as the beneficial owner of the dividend paid with respect to such shares or other rights for purposes of the application of Article 10 to any such equivalent amount. #### VII. In reference to [Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends) and [subparagraph 8 b) ii) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) For the purpose of [Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) and [subparagraph 8 b) ii) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits), it is understood that depository receipts or trust certificates of shares will be considered to possess the rights attached to the shares which they replace, including the voting rights thereof. #### VIII. In reference to [paragraph 3 of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), [paragraph 3 of Article 11](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel11) (Branch Tax) and [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) It is understood that a resident that would qualify for benefits under [subparagraph 3 a) of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends) or [Article 11](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel11) (Branch Tax), but does not do so because it acquired the relevant shareholding on or after October 1st, 1998, is not prevented from requesting a determination from the competent authority pursuant to subparagraph 3 d) of that Article, so long as it also does not meet the requirements of 3 b) and 3 c). #### IX. In reference to [paragraph 1 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains) In determining for purposes of [paragraph 1 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains) whether the assets of a corporation resident in the United States consist, directly or indirectly, for the greater part of real property situated in the United States and whether the stock of such corporation is a “United States real property interest”, the United States confirms that it will take into account the fair market value of all of the assets of the corporation, including intangible business assets such as goodwill, whether or not appearing as an asset on the balance sheet for tax purposes, going concern value and intellectual property. #### X. In reference to [paragraph 8 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains) It is understood that [paragraph 8 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains) shall not apply to an alienation of property by a resident of one of the States if the tax that would otherwise be imposed on such alienation by the other State cannot reasonably be imposed or collected at a later time. For example, under the domestic law of the United States, a foreign corporation that qualifies as a “United States real property holding corporation” is taxed in some circumstances if it transfers its assets to a United States corporation in a reorganization. In such a case, only if the shareholders of such foreign corporation agree to reduce basis (if and only to the extent available) by “closing agreement” can the tax that otherwise would be imposed on such alienation be reasonably imposed or collected at a later time. #### XI. In reference to [paragraph 4 of Article 19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony) It is understood that the term “other public pensions” as used in [paragraph 4 of Article 19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony) is intended to refer to United States tier 1 Railroad Retirement benefits. #### XII. In reference to [paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 10 of Article 19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony) It is understood that the term “exempt pension trust” includes those arrangements that are treated as exempt pension trusts for purposes of [Article 35](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel35) (Exempt Pension Trusts). #### XIII. In reference to paragraph 11 of [Article 19](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel19) (Pensions, Annuities, Alimony) It is understood that the competent authorities of both States will consult with a view to agreeing rules that will reduce the burden of the undertakings required of exempt pension trusts. Such rules will also seek to reduce the burden on the members or beneficiaries which may arise under Netherlands law. #### XIV. In reference to [paragraph 4 of Article 24](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIV_Artikel24) (Basis of Taxation) - a) It is understood that, where, by virtue of [paragraph 4 of Article 24](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIV_Artikel24) (Basis of Taxation) an item of income is considered by a State to be derived by a person who is a resident of that State, and the same item is considered by the other State to be derived by a person who is a resident of that other State, the paragraph shall not prevent either State from taxing the item as the income of the person considered by that State to have derived the item of income. The following example demonstrates the application of the preceding paragraph: Individual Z, a resident of the Netherlands, is the sole member of Y, a U.S. limited liability company (LLC). Y owns X, a U.S. corporation. Y has elected under the U.S. entity classification rules to be taxed as a U.S. corporation. Under Netherlands law, however, Y is treated, in this situation, as a fiscally transparent entity. On date A, X distributes a $100 dividend to Y. On date B, Y distributes a $100 dividend to Z. Under Netherlands law, the dividend from X to Y is considered to be derived by Z. The two States agree that, in these circumstances, the United States is not prevented from exercising full taxing jurisdiction over Y (which is treated as a U.S. corporation) and, accordingly, the United States may tax the dividends from X to Y and from Y to Z in accordance with its domestic law. However, with respect to the dividend from Y to Z, the rate of tax applicable to the dividend shall be determined in accordance with [Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10). - b) The competent authority of a State may grant the benefits of the Convention to a resident of the other State with respect to an item of income, even though it is not treated as income of the resident under the laws of that other State, in cases where the income would have been exempt from tax if it had been treated as the income of that resident. The following example demonstrates the application of the preceding paragraph: Z is an exempt pension trust within the meaning of [Article 35](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel35) (Exempt Pension Trusts) that is a resident of the Netherlands for purposes of the Convention. Z is a member of Y, a U.S. limited liability company that has elected to be treated as fiscally transparent for U.S. tax purposes. Because of certain characteristics, Y is non-transparent under Netherlands law. Y owns shares in a number of U.S. companies that pay dividends currently. Under the general rule of [paragraph 4 of Article 24](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIV_Artikel24) (Basis of Taxation), Z would not be entitled to the benefits of [Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends) because the income derived by Y is not treated by the Netherlands as the income of Z. However, the U.S. competent authority may determine that Z is entitled to benefits because Z would be exempt from tax on the income even if it were treated as having derived the income. #### XV. In reference to [Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) It is understood that the term “gross income” means the total revenues derived by a resident of a State from its principal operations, less the direct costs of obtaining such revenues. #### XVI. In reference to [subparagraph 2 f) and paragraph 3 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) It is understood that the proof a Dutch resident investment organization (a “beleggingsinstelling” in the sense of Article 28 of the “Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969”) has of the number of its Dutch resident individual and corporate shareholders as a result of the procedure used by such Dutch resident investment organization when claiming a reimbursement of tax withheld on its foreign dividend and interest income under paragraph 1 b) of Article 28 of the “Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969”, can be used by such Dutch investment organization to show that it fulfills the requirements of paragraph 2 f) and [paragraph 3 respectively of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits). #### XVII. With reference to [paragraphs 2 and 5 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) The competent authorities may, by mutual agreement, notwithstanding the provisions of these paragraphs, determine transition rules for newly-established business operations, newly-established corporate groups or newly-established headquarters companies. #### XVIII. In reference to paragraph 3 of [Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) The following example demonstrates an application of paragraph 3 of [Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26). A Netherlands resident company, Y, owns all of the shares in a U.S. resident company, Z. Y is wholly owned by X, a U.K. resident company that would not qualify for all of the benefits of the U.S.-U.K. income tax treaty but may qualify for benefits with respect to certain items of income under the “active trade or business” test of the U.S.-U.K. treaty. X, in turn, is wholly owned by W, a French resident-company that is substantially and regularly traded on the Paris Stock Exchange. Z pays a dividend to Y. For purposes of this example, assume that Y does not qualify for benefits under [paragraph 2 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits). Y does qualify for benefits under [paragraph 3 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26), however, assuming that the requirements of subparagraph 3 b) of Article 26 are met. Y is directly owned by X, which is not an equivalent beneficiary within the meaning of [subparagraph 8 f) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (X does not qualify for all of the benefits of the U.S.-U.K. tax treaty). However, Y is also indirectly owned by W, which is an equivalent beneficiary for purposes of the benefits provided by [paragraph 2 a) of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) within the meaning of [subparagraph 8 f) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (because W is a French resident company whose shares are substantially and regularly traded on a recognized stock exchange, within the meaning of the Limitation on Benefits Article of the U.S.-France income tax treaty). Accordingly, U.S. withholding tax on the dividend from Z to Y will be imposed at a rate of 5% in accordance with [subparagraph 2 a) of Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10). #### XIX. In reference to [paragraph 4 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) It is understood that an item of income is to be considered as derived “in connection” with an active trade or business in a State if the activity generating the item in the other state is a line of business which forms a part of, or is complementary to, the trade or business conducted in the first mentioned State. The line of business in the firstmentioned State may be “upstream” to that going on in the other State (e.g., providing inputs to a manufacturing process that occurs in that other State), “downstream” (e.g., selling the output of a manufacturer which is a resident of the other State) or “parallel” (e.g., selling in one State the same sorts of products that are being sold by the trade or business carried on in the other State). It is understood that an item of income derived from a State would be considered “incidental” to the trade or business carried on in the other State if the item is not produced by a line of business which forms a part of, or is complementary to, the trade or business conducted in that other State by the recipient of the item, but the production of such item facilitates the conduct of the trade or business in that other State. An example of such “incidental” item of income is interest income earned from the short-term investment of working capital or a resident of a State in securities issued by person in the other State. #### XX. In reference to [subparagraph 4 a) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) It is understood that for purposes of [subparagraph 4 a) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits), a bank only will be considered to be engaged in the active conduct of a banking business if it regularly accepts deposits from the public and makes loans to the public, and an insurance company only will be considered to be engaged in the active conduct of an insurance business if its gross income consists primarily of insurance or reinsurance premiums, and investment income attributable to such premiums. #### XXI. In reference to [paragraph 8 of Article 12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest) and subparagraph 4(a) of [Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26)(Limitation on Benefits) For the purpose of subparagraph 4 a) of Article 26 (Limitation on Benefits) and [paragraph 8 of Article 12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12)(Interest) it is understood that interest derived from group financing or portfolio investments shall be considered to be part of the business of making or managing investments. #### XXII. In reference to [subparagraph 4 b) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) It is understood that the substantiality requirement of subparagraph b) is intended to prevent a narrow case of treaty-shopping abuses in which a company attempts to qualify for treaty benefits by engaging in de minimis connected business activities that have little economic cost or effect with respect to the company's business as a whole. Whether a trade or business is substantial for purposes of this paragraph will be determined based on all the facts and circumstances. Such determination will take into account the comparative sizes of the trades or businesses in each Contracting State (measured by reference to asset values, income and payroll expenses), the nature of the activities performed in each Contracting State, and, in cases where a trade or business is conducted in both Contracting States, the relative contributions made to that trade or business in each Contracting State. In making each determination or comparison, due regard will be given to the relative sizes of the U.S. and Netherlands economies. In any case, however, a trade or business will be deemed substantial if, for the preceding taxable year, or for the average of the three preceding taxable years, the asset value, the gross income, and the payroll expense that are related to the trade or business in the firstmentioned State equal at least 7.5 percent of the resident's (and any related parties') proportionate share of the asset value, gross income and payroll expense, respectively, that generated the income in the other State, and the average of the three ratios exceeds 10 percent. If the resident owns, directly or indirectly, less than 100 percent of an activity conducted in either State, only the resident's proportionate interest in such activity will be taken into account for purposes of the test described in this paragraph. The following examples demonstrate the application of the substantiality requirement. Example 1 (i) V, a resident of a country that does not have a tax treaty with the Netherlands, wants to acquire a Netherlands financial institution. However, since its country of residence does not have a tax treaty with the Netherlands, any dividends generated by the investment would be subject to a Netherlands withholding tax of 25%. V establishes a U.S. corporation with one office in a small town to provide investment advice to local residents. That U.S. corporation acquires the Netherlands financial institution with capital provided by V. - (ii) The Netherlands source income is generated from business activities in the Netherlands that are related to the investment advisory business conducted by the U.S. parent. However, the substantiality test would not be met in this example, so the dividends would remain subject to withholding in the Netherlands at a rate of 25% rather than the rate provided in [Article 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends). Example 2 (i) S is a banking organization that is organized and managed and controlled in the Netherlands. S has a large number of local branches and customers in the Netherlands and sufficient employees to provide banking services to those customers. However, because the banking market in the Netherlands is crowded with competitors, S determined that it needed to establish branches outside the Netherlands in order to expand its business. In accordance with that plan, S established branches in several major cities in the United States to engage in the same type of banking business as in the Netherlands. Over time, the U.S. branches have grown significantly, and now are equal in size to the entire Netherlands business of S. - (ii) The business activities of the U.S. branches of S are related to the business conducted by S in the Netherlands. Because S has a large number of local branches and employees in the Netherlands, the activities of S in the Netherlands are substantial for purposes of [subparagraph 4 b) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits). Example 3 NLCo, a Netherlands corporation, owns 100 percent of the stock of USCo, a U.S. corporation, and 50 percent of the stock of NLSub, a Netherlands corporation. NLCo does not directly conduct an active trade or business. USCo and NLSub are actively engaged in the music business. USCo has a number of employees who are responsible for discovering new recording artists. USCo also produces recordings and is responsible for production and distrib ution within the United States. Employees of NLSub are responsible for promoting the recordings in the Netherlands and developing a distribution strategy for the rest of Europe. European sales of U.S. recording artists contribute substantiality to the profitability of USCo. NLCo receives payments of interest and dividends from USCo. In order for these payments to be entitled to treaty benefits under [paragraph 4 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26), NLCo must be considered to be engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business in the Netherlands. Under subparagraph 4 b), because NLCo and USCo are related persons, the activities conducted in the Netherlands and attributed to NLCo must be substantial in relation to the activities conducted by USCo. NLCo will be deemed to satisfy this requirement if the ratio of the assets, income and payroll attributable to NLCo to the assets, income and payroll attributable to USCo are at least 10 percent and each ratio is at least 7.5 percent. For each of the four most recently concluded taxable years, the asset values, gross income and payroll expenses of these corporations that are attributable to the trade or business were as follows: USCo NLSub Assets $300 $50 Income 50 10 Payroll 60 10 NLCo has no assets, income or payroll that are attributable to the trade or business. The assets, income and payroll of NLSub that are related to the trade or business may be attributed to NLCo, however, under subparagraph c), since NLCo is connected to NLSub by reason of its 50% beneficial ownership in NLSub. Accordingly, 50 percent of NLSub's assets, income and payroll are attributed to NLCo. The amounts attributed to NLCo and the percentage of USCo's corresponding amounts are as follows: NLCo NLCo as a Percentage of USCo Assets 8.3 $25 Income 10.0 5 Payroll 8.3 5 Since none of these percentages is greater than 10 percent, NLCo does not meet the requirements for the safe harbor described above. Moreover, application of the threeyear average rule does not change the result, since the relevant amounts for the three preceding years (and the resulting ratios) are equal to those for the first preceding taxable year. Nevertheless, NLCo will still qualify for benefits with respect to dividends received from USCo. The activities performed by NLSub are substantial in relation to those of USCo, taking into account the contributions of each company to the overall business of the group. #### XXIII. In reference to [subparagraph 5 a) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) - a) For the purpose of [subparagraph 5 a) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) it is understood that the activities referred to in that subparagraph must be performed in the State of residence of the person performing such activities. - b) It is understood that for purposes of [paragraph 5 a) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) a person will be considered to be engaged in ``supervision and administration" activities, only if it engages in a number of the kinds of activities listed below. For example, a person will be considered a headquarters company if it performs a significant number of the following functions for the group: group financing (which cannot be its principal function), pricing, marketing, internal auditing, internal communications and management. A simple comparison of the amount of gross income that the headquarters company derives from its different activities cannot be used alone to determine whether group financing is, or is not, the company's principal function. The above-mentioned functions are intended to be suggestive of the types of activities in which a headquarters company will be expected to engage; it is not intended to be exhaustive. Furthermore, it is understood that in determining if a substantial portion of the overall supervision and administration of the group is provided by the headquarters company, the activities it performs as a headquarters company for the group it supervises must be substantial in comparison to the same activities for the same group performed within the multinational. For example, a Japanese corporation establishes a subsidiary in the Netherlands to function as a headquarters company for its European and North American operations. The Japanese corporation also has two other subsidiaries functioning as headquarter companies; one for the African operations and one for the Asian operations. The Dutch headquarters company is the parent company for the subsidiaries through which the European and North American operations are carried on. The Dutch headquarters company supervises the bulk of the pricing, marketing, internal auditing, internal communications and management for its group. Although the Japanese overall parent sets the guidelines for all of its subsidiaries in defining the world-wide group policies with respect to each of these activities, and assures that these guidelines are carried out within each of the regional groups, it is the Dutch headquarters company that monitors and controls the way in which these policies are carried out within the group of companies that it supervises. The capital and payroll devoted by the Japanese parent to these activities relating to the group of companies the Dutch headquarter company supervises is small, relative to the capital and payroll devoted to these activities by the Dutch headquarters company. Moreover, neither the other two headquarter companies, nor any other related company besides the Japanese parent company, perform any of the abovementioned headquarter activities with respect to the group of companies that the Dutch headquarter company supervises. In the above case the Dutch headquarters company will be considered to provide a substantial portion of the overall supervision and administration of the group it supervises. #### XXIV. In reference to [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) - a) It is understood that a company resident in one of the States will be granted under [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) all the benefits of the Convention otherwise accorded to residents of a State with respect to the income it derives from the other State if it satisfies any other specified conditions for the obtaining of such benefits and if: - 1. shares representing more than 30 percent of the aggregate vote and value of all of its shares are owned, directly or indirectly, by persons who are qualified persons by reason of [subparagraphs a), b), clause i) of subparagraph c), or subparagraphs d) or e) of paragraph 2 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26); - 2. shares representing more than 70 percent of the aggregate vote and value of all its shares (and at least 50 percent of any disproportionate class of shares) are owned, directly or indirectly, by seven or fewer persons who are equivalent beneficiaries within the meaning of subparagraph 8 f); and less than 50 percent of the company's gross income for the taxable year in which the item of income arises is paid or accrued, directly or indirectly, to persons who are not equivalent beneficiaries, in the form of payments that are deductible for the purposes of the taxes covered by the Convention in the State of which the company is a resident (but not including arm's length payments in the ordinary course of business for services or tangible property and payments in respect of financial obligations to a bank, provided that where such bank is not a resident of a Contracting State such payment is attributable to a permanent establishment of that bank located in one of the Contracting States). - b) The competent authorities agree to use reasonable efforts to make a determination pursuant to paragraph 7 within six months of receiving from the taxpayer all necessary information. Further, the competent authorities of both States will meet semi-annually to discuss the status of all cases in which a determination has been requested. #### XXV. In reference to [subparagraph 2 c) and subparagraph 8 a) ii) of Article 26 (Limitation on Benefits)](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) A company that is listed on the Paris or Brussels stock exchanges that, together with the Amsterdam Stock Exchange, constitute Euronext, will be treated as satisfying the listing requirement of paragraph 2(c) so long as securities regulators in the Netherlands continue to supervise the functioning of the portion of the exchange that is located in the Netherlands. If the functioning or supervision of Euronext change substantially, the competent authority of the Netherlands will notify the competent authority of the United States and the two competent authorities will consider whether such treatment remains appropriate and whether adjustments should be made to achieve the purpose of this paragraph. #### XXVI. In reference to [subparagraphs 8 d) ii) and 8 e) iii) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) - a) In making the determination in subparagraph 8 d) ii), it is understood that the determination is based on an assessment of the decision making activities of all of the executive officers and senior management employees who are me mbers of the Executive Board or the Board of Directors of the company, as the case may be, unless such persons merely provide formal approval of decisions that are in fact made by others. If the executive officers of direct or indirect subsidiaries of the company perform the policymaking functions that are normally the responsibility of the Executive Board or Board of Directors of a corporate group, such as those described in subparagraph 8 e) iii), they will be deemed to be members of the Executive Board or the Board of Directors of the company for these purposes. If there are special voting or other arrangements that indicate that the board members (including persons described in the preceding sentence) do not in fact share equally in decision making, those persons will be considered only to the extent that they are responsible for making the decisions described in subparagraph 8 e) iii). - b) If a company that is a resident of the Netherlands and is regularly traded on one or more recognized stock exchanges is a parent company for an integrated group of companies that includes another parent company that is also regularly traded on one or more recognized stock exchanges and that other parent company is a resident of a state in the primary economic zone of the Netherlands that has an income tax treaty with the United States that provides for the same or lower rates of withholding with respect to dividends, branch tax, interest and royalties as are provided in [Articles 10](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel10) (Dividends), [11](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel11) (Branch Tax), [12](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel12) (Interest) and [13](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel13) (Royalties) of the Convention in comparable circumstances, then the first-referenced company will be treated as satisfying the requirements of subparagraph 8) e) iii) with respect to the location of staffs if the staffs conduct more of the activities described therein in the Netherlands and that other state than in any state other than the Netherlands and that other state. For this purpose, an “integrated group of companies” is a group of companies that includes the two parent companies described in the preceding sentence and chains of subsidiaries in which the parent companies have joint economic ownership. #### XXVII. In reference to [paragraph 5 of Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure). - A It is understood that the States will in any case exchange diplomatic notes as provided in [paragraph 5 of Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure), when the experience within the European Communities with regard to the application of the [Convention on the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0002893), signed on 23 July 1990, or the application of paragraph 5 of Article 25 of the tax convention between the United States of America and the Federal Republic of Germany for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital and to certain other taxes, signed on 29 August 1989, has proven to be satisfactory to the competent authorities of both States. After a period of three years after the entry into force of the Convention, the competent authorities shall consult in order to determine whether the conditions for the exchange of diplomatic notes have been fulfilled. - B If the competent authorities of both States agree to submit a disagreement regarding the interpretation or application of this Convention in a specific case to arbitration according to [paragraph 5 of Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29), the following procedures will apply: - 1. If, in applying [paragraphs 1 to 4 of Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29), the competent authorities fail to reach an agreement within two years of the date on which the case was submitted to one of the competent authorities, they may agree to invoke arbitration in a specific case, but only after fully exhausting the procedures available under paragraphs 1 to 4 of Article 29. The competent authorities will not generally accede to arbitration with respect to matters concerning the tax policy or domestic law of either State. - 2. The competent authorities shall establish an arbitration board for each specific case in the following manner: - a) An arbitration board shall consist of not fewer than three members. Each competent authority shall appoint the same number of members, and these members shall agree on the appointment of the other member(s). - b) The other member(s) of the arbitration board shall be from either State or from another OECD member country. The competent authorities may issue further instructions regarding the criteria for selecting the other member(s) of the arbitration board. - c) Arbitration board member(s) (and their staffs) upon their appointment must agree in writing to abide by and be subject to the applicable confidentiality and disclosure provisions of both States and the Convention. In case those provisions conflict, the most restrictive condition will apply. - 3. The competent authorities may agree on and instruct the arbitration board regarding specific rules of procedure, such as appointment of a chairman, procedures for reaching a decision, establishment of time limits, etc. Otherwise, the arbitration board shall establish its own rules of procedure consistent with generally accepted principles of equity. - 4. Taxpayers and/or their representatives shall be afforded the opportunity to present their views to the arbitration board. - 5. The arbitration board shall decide each specific case on the basis of the Convention, giving due consideration to the domestic laws of the States and the principles of international law. The arbitration board will provide to the competent authorities an explanation of its decision. The decision of the arbitration board shall be binding on both States and the taxpayer(s) with respect to that case. While the decision of the arbitration board shall not have precedential effect, it is expected that such decisions ordinarily will be taken into account in subsequent competent authority cases involving the same taxpayer(s), the same issue(s), and substantially similar facts, and may also be taken into account in other cases where appropriate. - 6. Costs for the arbitration procedure will be borne in the following manner: - a) Each State shall bear the cost of remuneration for the member(s) appointed by it, as well as for its representation in the proceedings before the arbitration board; - b) the cost of remuneration for the other member(s) and all other costs of the arbitration board shall be shared equally between the States; and - c) the arbitration board may decide on a different allocation of costs. However, if it deems appropriate in a specific case, in view of the nature of the case and the roles of the parties, the competent authority of one of the States may require the taxpayer(s) to agree to bear that State's share of the costs as a prerequisite for arbitration. - 7. The competent authorities may agree to modify or supplement these procedures; however, they shall continue to be bound by the general principles established herein. #### XXVIII. In reference to [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) - a) For purposes of [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits), in determining whether the establishment, acquisition, or maintenance of a corporation resident of one of the States has or had as one of its principal purposes the obtaining of benefits under this Convention, the competent authority of the State in which the income in question arises may consider the following factors (among others): - 1. The date of incorporation of the corporation in relation to the date that this Convention entered into force; - 2. The continuity of the historical business and ownership of the corporation; - 3. The business reasons for the corporation residing in its State of residence; - 4. The extent to which the corporation is claiming special tax benefits in its country of residence; - 5. The extent to which the corporation's business activity in the other State is dependent on the capital, assets, or personnel of the corporation in its State of residence; and - 6. The extent to which the corporation would be entitled to treaty benefits comparable to those afforded by this Convention if it had been incorporated in the country of residence of the majority of its shareholders. - b) It is understood that a company resident of one of the States will be granted the treaty benefits under [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) with respect to the income it derives from the other State, if such company: - 1. Holds stocks and securities the income from which is not predominantly from sources in the other State; - 2. Has widely dispersed ownership; and - 3. Employs in its state of residence a substantial staff actively engaged in trades of stocks and securities owned by the company. It is further understood that [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) will not apply if any of the abovementioned factors is absent. - c. It is understood that in applying [paragraph 7 of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits), the legal requirements for the facilitation of the free flow of capital and persons within the European Communities, together with the differing internal income tax systems, tax incentive regimes, and existing tax treaty policies among member states of the European Communities, will be considered. Under such paragraph, the competent authority is instructed to consider as its guideline whether the establishment, acquisition or maintenance of a company or the conduct of its operations has or had as one of its principal purposes the obtaining of benefits under this Convention. The competent authority may, therefore, determine under a given set of facts, that a change in circumstances that would cause a company to cease to qualify for treaty benefits under paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 26 need not necessarily result in a denial of benefits. Such changed circumstances may include a change in the state of residence of a major shareholder of a company, the sale of part of the stock of a Netherlands company to a person resident in another member state of the European Communities, or an expansion of a company's activities in other member states of the European Communities, all under ordinary business conditions. The competent authority will consider these changed circumstances (in addition to other relevant factors normally considered under paragraph 7 of Article 26) in determining whether such a company will remain qualified for treaty benefits with respect to income received from United States sources. If these changed circumstances are not attributable to tax avoidance motives, this also will be considered by the competent authority to be a factor weighing in favor of continued qualification under paragraph 7 of Article 26. - d. When a corporation resident in one of the States that is entitled to benefits under [Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) acquires a controlling interest in a corporation resident in a third state that in turn owns a controlling interest in a second corporation resident in the first- mentioned State, that second corporation may not be entitled to the benefits of the Convention due to the provisions of subparagraph 2 c) ii) of Article 26 with respect to income derived from sources within the other State. It is understood that in these circumstances the competent authority of the other State, in considering a request for benefits under the Convention under paragraph 7 of Article 26, will consider favorably a plan of reorganization submitted by the second corporation resident in the first- mentioned State, if such plan would result in the second corporation being entitled to the benefits of the Convention within a reasonable transition period (determined without regard to paragraph 7 of Article 26). #### XXIX. In reference to [paragraph 8 h) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits) In order to meet the “regularly traded” test under [subparagraph 8 h) of Article 26](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel26) (Limitation on Benefits), a person claiming benefits under the Convention need not prove that it has not engaged in, but may need to rebut evidence that it has engaged in, a pattern of trades on a recognized stock exchange in order to meet these tests. #### XXX. In reference to [Article 27](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel27) (Offshore Activities) It is understood that transport of supplies or personnel between one of the States and a location where activities are carried on off-shore in that State or between such locations is to be considered as transport between places in that State. #### XXXI. In reference to [paragraph 5 of Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure) - a. It is understood that the States will in any case exchange diplomatic notes as provided in [paragraph 5 of Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29) (Mutual Agreement Procedure), when the experience within the European Communities with regard to the application of the [Convention on the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises](/jci1.3:c:BWBV0002893), signed on 23 July 1990, or the application of paragraph 5 of Article 25 of the tax convention between the United States of America and the Federal Republic of Germany for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital and to certain other taxes, signed on 29 August 1989, has proven to be satisfactory to the competent authorities of both States. After a period of three years after the entry into force of the Convention, the competent authorities shall consult in order to determine whether the conditions for the exchange of diplomatic notes have been fulfilled. - b. If the competent authorities of both States agree to submit a disagreement regarding the interpretation or application of this Convention in a specific case to arbitration according to [paragraph 5 of Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29), the following procedures will apply: - 1. If, in applying [paragraphs 1 to 4 of Article 29](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel29), the competent authorities fail to reach an agreement within two years of the date on which the case was submitted to one of the competent authorities, they may agree to invoke arbitration in a specific case, but only after fully exhausting the procedures available under paragraphs 1 to 4 of Article 29. The competent authorities will not generally accede to arbitration with respect to matters concerning the tax policy or domestic law of either State. - 2. The competent authorities shall establish an arbitration board for each specific case in the following manner: - A) An arbitration board shall consist of not fewer than three members. Each competent authority shall appoint the same number of members, and these members shall agree on the appointment of the other member(s). - B) The other member(s) of the arbitration board shall be from either State or from another OECD member country. The competent authorities may issue further instructions regarding the criteria for selecting the other member(s) of the arbitration board. - C) Arbitration board member(s) (and their staffs) upon their appointment must agree in writing to abide by and be subject to the applicable confidentiality and disclosure provisions of both States and the Convention. In case those provisions conflict, the most restrictive condition will apply. - 3. The competent authorities may agree on and instruct the arbitration board regarding specific rules of procedure, such as appointment of a chairman, procedures for reaching a decision, establishment of time limits, etc. Otherwise, the arbitration board shall establish its own rules of procedure consistent with generally accepted principles of equity. - 4. Taxpayers and/or their representatives shall be afforded the opportunity to present their views to the arbitration board. - 5. The arbitration board shall decide each specific case on the basis of the Convention, giving due consideration to the domestic laws of the States and the principles of international law. The arbitration board will provide to the competent authorities an explanation of its decision. The decision of the arbitration board shall be binding on both States and the taxpayer(s) with respect to that case. While the decision of the arbitration board shall not have presidential effect, it is expected that such decisions ordinarily will be taken into account in subsequent competent authority cases involving the same taxpayer(s), the same issue(s), and substantially similar facts, and may also be taken into account in other cases where appropriate. - 6. Costs for the arbitration procedure will be borne in the following manner: - A) Each State shall bear the cost of remuneration for the member(s) appointed by it, as well as for its representation in the proceedings before the arbitration board; - B) The cost of remuneration for the other member(s) and all other costs of the arbitration board shall be shared equally between the States; and - C) The arbitration board may decide on a different allocation of costs. However, if it deems appropriate in a specific case, in view of the nature of the case and the roles of the parties, the competent authority of one of the States may require the taxpayer(s) to agree to bear that State's share of the costs as a prerequisite for arbitration. - 7. The competent authorities may agree to modify or supplement these procedures; however, they shall continue to be bound by the general principles established herein. #### XXXII. In reference to [Article 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) (Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance) If a United States “reporting corporation” (as defined for purposes of section 6038A of the United States Internal Revenue Code) that is a United States resident, or a United States permanent establishment of a United States “reporting corporation” that is not a United States resident, has neither possession of nor access to records that may be relevant to the United States income tax treatment of any transaction between it and a foreign “related party” (as defined in section 6038A of the United States Internal Revenue Code), and such records are under the control of a Netherlands resident and are maintained outside the United States, then the United States shall request such records from the Netherlands through an exchange of information under [Article 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) (Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance) before issuing a summons for such records to the United States “reporting corporation”, provided that under all the circumstances presented, the records will be obtainable through the request on a timely and efficient basis. For purposes of this paragraph, records will be considered to be available on a timely and efficient basis if they can be obtained within 180 days of the request or such other period agreed upon in mutual agreement between the competent authorities, except where the statute of limitations may expire in a shorter period. Similar principles shall apply with respect to the application of section 6038C. #### XXXIII. In reference to [Article 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) (Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance) Pursuant to [paragraph 2 thereof](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30), which provides that the competent authorities shall endeavor to provide information in the form of depositions of witnesses and authenticated copies of unedited original documents, it is understood that the competent authorities of the States will work together to develop mutual procedures that reconcile differences in internal domestic laws and procedures with the aim of ensuring that information is provided in a form that facilitates its use in judicial proceedings in the requesting State. #### XXXIV. In reference to [paragraph 1 of Article 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) (Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance) It is understood that persons concerned with the “administration” of taxes, as that term is used in [paragraph 1 of Article 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) (Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance) include, in the United States, the “tax-writing committees of Congress” and the “General Accounting Office”. Information exchanged under the Convention that is otherwise confidential under the Convention may be received under the same requirement of confidentiality by these bodies and may be used only in the performance of their role of overseeing the administration of United States tax laws. Congress's and the “General Accounting Office's” role in overseeing the administrative of United States tax law is understood to be limited to ensuring that the administration of the tax law by the executive branch is honest, efficient, and consistent with legislative intent. #### XXXV. In reference to [Article 31](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel31) (Assistance and Support in Collection) It is understood that in applying [Article 31](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel31) (Assistance and Support in Collection) the following shall be taken into account: - 1. The requested State shall not be obliged to accede to the request of the applicant State: - A) If the applicant State has not pursued all appropriate collection action in its own jurisdiction; - B) In those cases where the administrative burden for the requested State is disproportionate to the benefit to be derived by the applicant State. - 2. The request for administrative assistance in the recovery of a tax claim shall be accompanied by: - A) An official copy of the instrument permitting enforcement in the applicant State; - B) Where appropriate, certified copies of any other document required for recovery; - C) A certificatio n by the competent authority of the applicant State that, under the laws of that State, the revenue claim has been finally determined. For the purposes of this Article, a revenue claim is finally determined when the applicant State has the right under its internal law to collect the revenue claim and all administrative and judicial rights of the taxpayer to restrain collection in the applicant State have lapsed or been exhausted. - 3. A revenue claim of the applicant State that has been finally determined may be accepted for collection by the competent authority of the requested State and, subject to the provisions of paragraph 7 below, if accepted shall be collected by the requested State as though such revenue claim were the requested State's own revenue claim finally determined in accordance with the laws applicable to the collection of the requested State's own taxes. - 4. Where an application for collection of a revenue claim in respect of a taxpayer is accepted: - A) By the United States, the revenue claim shall be treated by the United States as an assessment under United States laws against the taxpayer as of the time the application is received; and - B) By the Netherlands, the revenue claim shall be treated by the Netherlands as an amount payable under appropriate Netherlands law, the collection of which is not subject to any restriction. - 5. Nothing in this Article shall be construed as creating or providing any rights of administrative or judicial review of applicant State's finally determined revenue claim by the requested State, based on any such rights that may be available under the laws of either State. If, at any time pending execution of a request for assistance under this Article, the applicant State loses the right under its internal law to collect the revenue claim, the competent authority of the applicant State shall promptly withdraw the request for assistance in collection. - 6. Subject to this paragraph, amounts collected by the requested State pursuant to this Article shall be forwarded to the competent authority of the applicant State. Unless the competent authorities of the States otherwise agree, the ordinary costs incurred in providing collection assistance shall be borne by the requested State and any extraordinary costs so incurred shall be borne by the applicant State. - 7. The requested State may allow deferral of payment or payment by installments, if its laws or administrative practice permit it to do so in similar circumstances, but it shall first inform the applicant State. Any interest received by the requested State as a result of the allowance of a deferral of payment or payment by installments will be transferred to the competent authority of the applicant State. - 8. A revenue claim of an applicant State accepted for collection shall not have in the requested State any priority accorded to the revenue claims of the requested State. - 9. The competent authorities may under this Article grant assistance in collecting any tax deferred by operation of [paragraph 8 of Article 14](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukIII_Artikel14) (Capital Gains). - 10. The competent authorities of the States shall agree upon the mode of application of this Article. The competent authorities of the States may further agree to modify or supplement these procedures, however, they shall continue to be bound by the general principles established herein. #### XXXVI. In reference to [paragraph 2 of Article 32](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel32) (Limitations of [Articles 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) and [31](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel31)) It is understood that the competent authorities of each State shall use all reasonable efforts to obtain and provide information respecting interests in a person in response to a request from the other State. [Paragraph 2 of Article 32](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel32) (Limitations of [Articles 30](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel30) and [31](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel31)) does not, however, create an obligation on the competent authorities of either State to obtain and provide information respecting interests in a person unless such information can be obtained without giving rise to disproportionate difficulties. #### XXXVII. In reference to [paragraph 2 of Article 35](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel35) (Exempt Pension Trusts) For the purpose of [paragraph 2 of Article 35](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1_HoofdstukV_Artikel35) (Exempt Pension Trusts), a person is considered to be a related person if more than 80% of the vote or value of any class of the shares is owned by the person deriving the income. #### XXXVIII. In General It is understood that the two Governments shall consult together at regular intervals regarding the terms, operation and application of the [Convention](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1) to ensure that it continues to serve the purposes of avoiding double taxation and preventing fiscal evasion and shall, where they consider it appropriate, conclude further Protocols to amend the Convention. The first such consultation shall take place no later than December 31st in the fifth year following the date on which the Protocol enters into force in accordance with the provisions of Article 10 of the Protocol. Further consultations shall take place thereafter at intervals of no more than five years. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, either Government may at any time request consultations with the other Government on matters relating to the terms, operation and applicatiøn of the Convention which it considers require urgent resolution. #### Nr. I DEPARTMENT OF STATE WASHINGTON Washington D.C., March 8, 2004 Excellency, I have the honor to refer to the Protocol signed today between the United States of America and the Kingdom of the Netherlands Amending the [Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion](#Verdrag_2_Verdragtekst_1) with Respect to Taxes on Income and to propose on behalf of the Government of the United States the following: In the course of the negotiations leading to the conclusion of the Protocol signed today, the negotiators developed and agreed upon the Understanding that is attached to this note. The Understanding is a statement of intent setting forth a common understanding and interpretation of certain provisions of the Protocol reached by the delegations of the United States and the Kingdom of the Netherlands on behalf of their respective governments. These understandings and interpretations are intended to give guidance both to the taxpayers and the tax authorities of our two countries in interpreting these provisions. It was further decided that this Understanding will supersede the Understanding accompanying the 1992 Convention and the related exchange of notes accompanying the 1993 Protocol. If the understandings and interpretations in the Understanding are acceptable, this note and your [note](#Verdrag_2_VerdragtekstII_2) reflecting such acceptance will memorialize the understandings and interpretations that the parties have reached. Accept, Excellency, renewed assurances of my highest consideration. For the Secretary of State: ELIZABETH JONES His Excellency Boudewijn van Eenennaam Ambassador of the Kingdom of the Netherlands #### Nr. II Washington D.C., March 8, 2004 Mr. Secretary, I have the honor to confirm receipt of your [Note](#Verdrag_2_VerdragtekstI_2) of today's date which reads as follows: [Red: (Zoals in Nr. I)] I Have the honor to inform you, that my Government agrees to the above. Accept, Your Excellency, the expression of my highest consideration. B. J. VAN EENENNAAM Ambassadeur van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden State Department of the United States of America Afdrukken[Annuleren](/BWBV0001109/2004-12-28/0#Verdrag_2) - [Over deze website](https://www.overheid.nl/over-deze-site) - [Contact](https://www.overheid.nl/contact/reageren-op-wet-en-regelgeving) - [English](https://www.overheid.nl/english) - [Help](https://www.overheid.nl/help/wet-en-regelgeving) - [Zoeken](https://www.overheid.nl/help/zoeken) - [Informatie hergebruiken](https://www.overheid.nl/informatie-hergebruiken) - [Privacy en cookies](https://www.overheid.nl/privacy-statement) - [Toegankelijkheid](https://www.overheid.nl/toegankelijkheid) - [Sitemap](https://www.overheid.nl/sitemap) - [Kwetsbaarheid melden](https://www.ncsc.nl/contact/kwetsbaarheid-melden) - [Linked Data Overheid](https://linkeddata.overheid.nl/) - [Powersearch](http://powersearch.wetten.nl/) - [MijnOverheid.nl](https://mijn.overheid.nl/) - [Rijksoverheid.nl](https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/) - [Ondernemersplein](https://ondernemersplein.kvk.nl/) - [Werkenbijdeoverheid.nl](https://www.werkenbijdeoverheid.nl/)