Canada / United States
Canada–US 1980 convention, Canadian statutory Schedule I
Original source edition
Source & edition
Canada–United States Tax Convention Act, 1984, S.C. 1984, c.20, Schedule I
- Official online text · retained capture Official source website ↗
SHA-256
a9ca8b9db9ac9af69a12d08436b12a98fbe88c0964880a7e103a59a36549fabfDigest scope: retained online-source capture; no PDF binary verification
- Language source · fr · French official publication of the source-declared authentic base Convention, with separately classified 2007 Annexes/diplomatic-note translations Official source website ↗
SHA-256
a27777487287980a804d86064fa2a9013fe3c611d7e4bbac4a13e180e41aff6aDigest scope: exact retained official-html-text-capture bytes; not current-law certification
- Edition
- Schedule I to S.C. 1984, c.20; base convention and printed annexes, not an amendment consolidation
- Text available here
- English, Français
- Review
- Unreviewed; qualified human review pending
- Current applicability
- Not verified
Languages recorded in source metadata: English. This is not a promise of available text or a translation.
Edition notes and known limitations
This Schedule I preserves the base convention article sequence I–XXXI. It does not silently apply the separately printed amending protocols in Schedules II–VI.
Complete official XML of the Act and five amending protocols is separately retained under xml/ca-us-1980-with-protocols/.
Source-page annexes and diplomatic notes are retained as supplements, not appended to Article XXXI.
Capture SHA256 identifies complete retained publisher-text extraction, not original HTML transport bytes or any PDF.
Full capture/provenance: html/ca-us-1980-schedule/proof.json
v3 clean source sections: top-level searchable supplements have exact source offsets/hashes. Government navigation/footer and implementing-order explanatory notes remain in capture but are not treaty/legal supplement units.
Source authority, text completeness and currentness still require human review.
Editions and protocols remain separate. A language choice is not a claim of equivalent or legally aligned text.