(1) Nationals of a Contracting State shall not be subjected in
the other Contracting State to any taxation or any requirement
connected therewith which is other or more burdensome than
the taxation and connected requirements to which nationals of
that other State in the same circumstances, in particular with re-
spect to residence, are or may be subjected. This provision shall,
notwithstanding the provisions of Article 1, also apply to persons
who are not residents of one or both of the Contracting States.
(2) Stateless persons who are residents of a Contracting State
shall not be subjected in either Contracting State to any taxation
or any requirement connected therewith, which is other or more
burdensome than the taxation and connected requirements to
which nationals of the State concerned in the same circum-
stances, in particular with respect to residence, are or may be
subjected.
(3) The taxation on a permanent establishment which an
enterprise of a Contracting State has in the other Contracting
State shall not be less favourably levied in that other State than
the taxation levied on enterprises of that other State carrying on
the same activities. This provision shall not be construed as
obliging a Contracting State to grant to residents of the other
Contracting State any personal allowances, reliefs and
reductions for taxation purposes on account of civil status or
family responsibilities which it grants to its own residents.
(4) Except where the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 9,
paragraph 5 of Article 11, or paragraph 5 of Article 12, apply,
interest, royalties and other disbursements paid by an enterprise
of a Contracting State to a resident of the other Contracting State
shall, for the purpose of determining the taxable profits of such
enterprise, be deductible under the same conditions as if they
had been paid to a resident of the first-mentioned State.
Similarly, any debts of an enterprise of a Contracting State to a
resident of the other Contracting State shall, for the purpose of
determining the taxable capital of such enterprise, be deductible
under the same conditions as if they had been contracted to a
resident of the first-mentioned State.
(5) Enterprises of a Contracting State, the capital of which is
wholly or partly owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by one
or more residents of the other Contracting State, shall not be
subjected in the first-mentioned State to any taxation or any
requirement connected therewith which is other or more
burdensome than the taxation and connected requirements to
which other similar enterprises of the first-mentioned State are
or may be subjected.
de-hungary-2011-base | BGBl. 2011 II S. 919 | Signed: 2011-02-28 | Gazette publication: 2011-10-07
Source form
official-publication PDF retained unchanged; reader derives from an evidenced native font-map encoding-recovery derivative, not OCR
Source scope
original implementing law, bilingual base treaty and accompanying protocol; not a current consolidated text
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Text and language scope
The original signing clause identifies German, Hungarian and English as authentic. Only German and English are supplied; the authentic Hungarian version is NOT included. The clause gives English precedence in divergent interpretation of the German and Hungarian texts. Unreviewed coordinate-based machine transcription of this original source edition only. Printed line breaks, hyphens and uncertain token spacing are retained, not silently corrected. Treaty preamble, closing formula, protocol and shared signatures are separate retained assets, not part of the last article. Full supplements: /review/de-hungary-2011-base/. PDF page links identify pages, not verified paragraph correspondence. Signed 2011-02-28; consent law 2011-09-30; Gazette publication 2011-10-07; treaty entry into force UNRESOLVED in pinned audit (retained official-article audit evidence); general application from 2012-01-01 (roster, not universal tax-specific start). Encoding-recovery method: only independently evidenced source font code00 /space Unicode mappings U+0007 to U+0020 changed in a separately hashed derivative. CFF blank glyphs, 278-unit advances, unchanged decoded page content streams and 22/22 identical page renders evidence this mapping. Word regrouping is logged; every nonspace character is conserved in sequence within its physical source line. No generated treaty wording and no OCR.
Review status
Pending human wording, completeness, source-authority, currentness, alignment and rendering review. No legal review performed.
Currentness
Original source edition; not a verified current-law consolidation. Original base edition only; current law NOT verified. Integral protocol retained separately, not merged into the final article. Later changes and 2026 developments are not exhaustively verified. KNOWN MLI EFFECTS OMITTED: audit records general application from 2025-01-01 and Part VI from 2024-11-01; neither is incorporated. Tax-specific MLI application remains unreviewed. Replaces agreement signed 1977-07-18; exact transitional effects remain unreviewed. Bounded agent triage, no qualified wording/alignment/legal review. No exhaustive verification of all later 2026 developments. Matching digest proves retained source identity, not legal force.
Protocols and later instruments
Integral protocol retained separately, not merged into the final article. Later changes and 2026 developments are not exhaustively verified. KNOWN MLI EFFECTS OMITTED: audit records general application from 2025-01-01 and Part VI from 2024-11-01; neither is incorporated. Tax-specific MLI application remains unreviewed. Replaces agreement signed 1977-07-18; exact transitional effects remain unreviewed. Source-triage warnings: Bounded agent triage, no qualified wording/alignment/legal review. No exhaustive verification of all later 2026 developments. Matching digest proves retained source identity, not legal force. Known related/later instruments NOT included in this source (agent triage, not exhaustive): BEPS-MLI; general application from: 2025-01-01; part VI general application from: 2024-11-01
Text language and status
en · authentic-language-transcription · machine-transcription
BGBl. 2011 II S. 919 | de-hungary-2011-base | de-hungary-2011-base | BGBl. 2011 II S. 919 | Signed: 2011-02-28 | Gazette publication: 2011-10-07 | Article 23 | en | Pending human wording, completeness, source-authority, currentness, alignment and rendering review. No legal review performed. | /library/treaties/de-hungary-2011-base/en/articles/article-23/
Source, edition and limits
Source edition
de-hungary-2011-base | BGBl. 2011 II S. 919 | Signed: 2011-02-28 | Gazette publication: 2011-10-07
Source form
official-publication PDF retained unchanged; reader derives from an evidenced native font-map encoding-recovery derivative, not OCR
Source scope
original implementing law, bilingual base treaty and accompanying protocol; not a current consolidated text
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Text and language scope
The original signing clause identifies German, Hungarian and English as authentic. Only German and English are supplied; the authentic Hungarian version is NOT included. The clause gives English precedence in divergent interpretation of the German and Hungarian texts. Unreviewed coordinate-based machine transcription of this original source edition only. Printed line breaks, hyphens and uncertain token spacing are retained, not silently corrected. Treaty preamble, closing formula, protocol and shared signatures are separate retained assets, not part of the last article. Full supplements: /review/de-hungary-2011-base/. PDF page links identify pages, not verified paragraph correspondence. Signed 2011-02-28; consent law 2011-09-30; Gazette publication 2011-10-07; treaty entry into force UNRESOLVED in pinned audit (retained official-article audit evidence); general application from 2012-01-01 (roster, not universal tax-specific start). Encoding-recovery method: only independently evidenced source font code00 /space Unicode mappings U+0007 to U+0020 changed in a separately hashed derivative. CFF blank glyphs, 278-unit advances, unchanged decoded page content streams and 22/22 identical page renders evidence this mapping. Word regrouping is logged; every nonspace character is conserved in sequence within its physical source line. No generated treaty wording and no OCR.
Review status
Pending human wording, completeness, source-authority, currentness, alignment and rendering review. No legal review performed.
Currentness
Original source edition; not a verified current-law consolidation. Original base edition only; current law NOT verified. Integral protocol retained separately, not merged into the final article. Later changes and 2026 developments are not exhaustively verified. KNOWN MLI EFFECTS OMITTED: audit records general application from 2025-01-01 and Part VI from 2024-11-01; neither is incorporated. Tax-specific MLI application remains unreviewed. Replaces agreement signed 1977-07-18; exact transitional effects remain unreviewed. Bounded agent triage, no qualified wording/alignment/legal review. No exhaustive verification of all later 2026 developments. Matching digest proves retained source identity, not legal force.
Protocols and later instruments
Integral protocol retained separately, not merged into the final article. Later changes and 2026 developments are not exhaustively verified. KNOWN MLI EFFECTS OMITTED: audit records general application from 2025-01-01 and Part VI from 2024-11-01; neither is incorporated. Tax-specific MLI application remains unreviewed. Replaces agreement signed 1977-07-18; exact transitional effects remain unreviewed. Source-triage warnings: Bounded agent triage, no qualified wording/alignment/legal review. No exhaustive verification of all later 2026 developments. Matching digest proves retained source identity, not legal force. Known related/later instruments NOT included in this source (agent triage, not exhaustive): BEPS-MLI; general application from: 2025-01-01; part VI general application from: 2024-11-01
Text language and status
en · authentic-language-transcription · machine-transcription