United Kingdom / United States · UK–US 2001 convention as amended by the 2002 protocol
English · amended source publication
United Kingdom / United States; HMRC: 2001 UK-USA Double Taxation Convention as amended by the 2002 protocol; edition HMRC consolidated online publication, updated 9 August 2021; article 28; English; unreviewed source text, current applicability unverified; /editions/gb-us-2001-2002/en/articles/article-28/
Unreviewed machine transcription. Not a verified current-law consolidation or legal advice. Later changes may be missing.
Language switching retains source identifiers only. This is not reviewed legal or translational equivalence.
Page links are source references, not verified paragraph correspondence. Formatting and extraction errors may remain.
Noindex is not access control. This is a research preview, not a statement of authoritative or current law.
HMRC: 2001 UK-USA Double Taxation Convention as amended by the 2002 protocol
SHA-256 92cbe4e4315d576a83829439877a59469d63ca6131d0fad679d591744ee08048
Digest scope: retained online-source capture; no PDF binary verification
Languages recorded in source metadata: English. This is not a promise of available text or a translation.
Official publisher consolidation of the 2001 convention and 2002 protocol, not an assistant-generated consolidation.
HMRC separately lists 2021 competent-authority agreements; not incorporated by this intake. IRS/Treasury original/protocol/technical-explanation links remain in source-index.json.
Publisher labels this edition “in force”; present legal applicability is not independently certified.
Capture SHA256 identifies complete retained publisher-text extraction, not original HTML transport bytes or any PDF.
Full capture/provenance: html/uk-us-2001-amended-2002/proof.json
v3 clean source sections: top-level searchable supplements have exact source offsets/hashes. Government navigation/footer and implementing-order explanatory notes remain in capture but are not treaty/legal supplement units.
Source authority, text completeness and currentness still require human review.