1. The nationals of a Contracting State shall not be subjected in the other Contracting State to
any taxation or any requirement connected therewith which is other or more burdensome
than the taxation and connected requirements to which nationals of that other State in the
same circumstances are or may be subjected.
2. The taxation on a permanent establishment which an enterprise of a Contracting State has in
the other Contracting State shall not be less favourably levied in that other State than the
taxation levied on enterprises of that other State carrying on the same activities in the same
circumstances or under the same conditions. This provision shall not be construed as
preventing a Contracting State from charging the profits of a permanent establishment which
an enterprise of the other Contracting State has in the firstmentioned State at a rate of tax
which is higher than that imposed on the profits of a similar enterprise of the first-mentioned
Contracting State, nor as being in conflict with the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 7 of
this Convention.
3. Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed as obliging a Contracting State to grant
to individuals not resident in that State any personal allowances, reliefs and reductions for
taxation purposes which are by law available only to individuals who are so resident.
4. Enterprises of a Contracting State, the capital of which is wholly or partly owned or
controlled, directly or indirectly, by one or more residents of the other Contracting State,
shall not be subjected in the first-mentioned Contracting State to any taxation or any
requirement connected therewith which is other or more burdensome than the taxation and
connected requirements to which other similar enterprises of that first-mentioned State are or
may be subjected.
Unknown actual amended PDF publication; filename 2013 is amendment wording, not a verified publication date
Languages recorded in source metadata: English, हिन्दी. This is not a promise of available text or a translation.
Edition notes and known limitations
The signed closing has been separated from Article 31 by an exact retained-source boundary; no wording or PDF bytes changed. The retained extraction ledger predates this navigation repair.
Research observed on the related SI made page: 'Made 20th July 1993' and 'At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 20th day of July 1993'. This is the related UK domestic enabling instrument made date, NOT the publication date of the amended PDF or the convention signed date. Filename contains 'as_amended_in_2013_-_in_force'; that is filename status wording only, not independently verified current legal status. Search-result title reported 'UK/India Double Taxation Convention Signed 25 January 1993', not verified within a fetched document and not asserted as a verified signed-date field. No revocation noted on the made page is not proof of currentness. Product generation additionally verifies the underlying convention signature clause in the retained native transcription with exact offsets; this does not date the amended publication or prove currentness.
official amended source publication kept separate; no product-generated consolidation or currentness proof
Native extraction blocks are navigation references, not verified legal paragraphs. Page references are extraction-page slots, not visually verified correspondence. Front matter and material outside article navigation remain in the complete transcription.