Skip to content
tax-treaties.com
Find a pairAbout the sourcesResearch preview

Articles

Browse all articles
1Article 1 · 2Article 2 · 3Article 3 · 4Article 4 · 5Article 5 · 6Article 6 · 7Article 7 · 8Article 8 · 9Article 9 · 10Article 10 · 11Article 11 · 12Article 12 · 13Article 13 · 14Article 14 · 15Article 15 · 16Article 16 · 17Article 17 · 18Article 18 · 19Article 19 · 20Article 20 · 21Article 21 · 22Article 22 · 23Article 23 · 24Article 24 · 25Article 25 · 26Article 26 · 26aArticle 26A · 27Article 27 · 28Article 28 · 29Article 29 · Preamble · Title, publisher explanation and complete preambleSignature · Signature and authentic-language clause

30 articles · English

Source & edition
Country pairs / United Kingdom / Japan

United Kingdom / Japan · United Kingdom–Japan 2006 Convention: official MLI synthesis

Official MLI synthesis of 2006 Convention as amended by 2013 Protocol; HMRC updated 13 November 2018

Article 10 ·

English · synthesized source publication

Unreviewed · applicability unverifiedPublisher synthesis · authentic texts prevail
Original & source
§
- 1. Dividends paid by a company which is a resident of a Contracting State to a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other Contracting State.
§
- 2. However, such dividends may also be taxed in the Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident and according to the laws of that Contracting State, but if the dividends are beneficially owned by a resident of the other Contracting State, the tax so charged shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends.
§
- 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article, dividends shall not be taxed in the Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a resident of the other Contracting State and either:
§
- (a) is a company that has owned, directly or indirectly, shares representing at least 10 per cent of the voting power of the company paying the dividends for the period of six months ending on the date on which entitlement to the dividends is determined; or
§
- (b) is a pension fund or pension scheme, provided that such dividends are not derived from the carrying on of a business, directly or indirectly, by such pension fund or pension scheme.
§
- 4. The provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall not affect the taxation of the company in respect of the profits out of which the dividends are paid.
§
- 5. The provisions of subparagraph (a) of paragraph 3 of this Article shall not apply in the case of dividends paid by a company which is entitled to a deduction for dividends paid to its beneficiaries in computing its taxable income in Japan.
§
- 6. The term ‘dividends’ as used in this Article means income from shares or other rights, not being debt-claims, participating in profits, as well as income which is subjected to the same taxation treatment as income from shares by the tax laws of the Contracting State of which the payer is a resident.
§
- 7. The provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the dividends, being a resident of a Contracting State, carries on business in the other Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident through a permanent establishment situated therein and the holding in respect of which the dividends are paid is effectively connected with such permanent establishment. In such case the provisions of Article 7 of this Convention shall apply.
§
- 8. Where a company which is a resident of a Contracting State derives income, profits or gains from the other Contracting State, that other Contracting State may not impose any tax on the dividends paid by the company, except insofar as such dividends are paid to a resident of that other Contracting State or insofar as the holding in respect of which the dividends are paid is effectively connected with a permanent establishment situated in that other Contracting State, nor subject the company’s undistributed profits to a tax on the company’s undistributed profits, even if the dividends paid or the undistributed profits consist wholly or partly of income, profits or gains arising in such other Contracting State.
§
- 9. A resident of a Contracting State shall not be considered the beneficial owner of dividends paid by a resident of the other Contracting State in respect of preferred stock or other similar interest if such preferred stock or other similar interest would not have been established or acquired unless a person:
§
- (a) that is not entitled to benefits with respect to dividends paid by a resident of the other Contracting State which are equivalent to, or more favourable than, those available under this Convention to a resident of the first-mentioned Contracting State; and
§
- (b) that is not a resident of either Contracting State;
§
- held equivalent preferred stock or other similar interest in the first-mentioned resident.
§
- 10. [REPLACED by paragraph 1 of Article 7 of the MLI] [No relief shall be available under this Article if it was the main purpose or one of the main purposes of any person concerned with the creation or assignment of the shares or other rights in respect of which the dividend is paid to take advantage of this Article by means of that creation or assignment.]
Citation to select or copy

United Kingdom / Japan; HMRC, Synthesised text of the Multilateral Instrument and the 2006 UK-Japan Double Taxation Convention; edition Official MLI synthesis of 2006 Convention as amended by 2013 Protocol; HMRC updated 13 November 2018; article 10; English; source role publisher-synthesis; Official publisher synthesis, not an authentic signed original or current-law certification. Publisher qualifications remain source text and searchable.; unreviewed source text, current applicability unverified; /editions/gb-jp-2006-hmrc-mli-synthesis-html-reserve-v1/en/articles/article-10/

Disclaimers

Unreviewed machine transcription. Not a verified current-law consolidation or legal advice. Later changes may be missing.

Language switching retains source identifiers only. This is not reviewed legal or translational equivalence.

Page links are source references, not verified paragraph correspondence. Formatting and extraction errors may remain.

Noindex is not access control. This is a research preview, not a statement of authoritative or current law.

Source & edition

HMRC, Synthesised text of the Multilateral Instrument and the 2006 UK-Japan Double Taxation Convention

  • Official online text · retained capture Official source website ↗

    SHA-256 4cba14eb3afcd8e71deafcd2bfbd0c0c42387432ab3f58585d671d605eeca756

    Digest scope: retained online-source capture; no PDF binary verification

Publisher role and language

Official publisher synthesis, not an authentic signed original or current-law certification. Publisher qualifications remain source text and searchable.

Official publisher synthesis, not assistant consolidation; differentiated MLI effects and precedence of authentic texts retained verbatim.

Actual supplied body languages: English. A language named by an instrument is not a supplied translation.

Edition
Official MLI synthesis of 2006 Convention as amended by 2013 Protocol; HMRC updated 13 November 2018
Text available here
English
Review
Unreviewed; qualified human review pending
Current applicability
Not verified
Underlying instrument signature
2006-02-02

Languages recorded in source metadata: English. This is not a promise of available text or a translation.

Edition notes and known limitations

Official HTML text capture, not Original PDF; human wording and current-law certification not claimed.

Block IDs are navigation aids, never invented legal paragraph numbers. Native extraction can flatten ordered-list styling; only printed source labels are retained.

Complete preamble, closing and all supplied integral protocol/notes are retained separately and searchable within this source.

Original source headings provide Article numbers without subject titles; no editorial titles fabricated. Only English publication body captured; Japanese authentic text not supplied in this manifestation.

Publisher synthesis, not an authentic treaty instrument. MLI replacement text and explanations are retained; original boxes/layout are not reproduced. Authentic Convention and MLI texts take precedence.

Source authority, text completeness and currentness still require human review.

Retained metadata & integrity record

← Article 9Article 11 →

All articles in this edition · Other editions for this pair

Treaty source library · research previewCoverage & limitationsOperator / AnbieterBisherige Quellenbibliothek