I have the honour to refer to the Convention between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of South Africa for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital Gains which has been signed today and to make on behalf of the Government of the United Kingdom the following proposal:
It is understood that the secondary tax on companies is a tax payable in respect of the profits of South African companies and the allowance as a credit for this tax against United Kingdom tax is to be determined in accordance with the terms of sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph 2 of Article 21 of the Convention.
If the foregoing proposal is acceptable to the Government of the Republic of South Africa, I have the honour to suggest that the present Note and Your Excellency’s reply to that effect should be regarded as constituting an agreement between the two Governments in this matter, which shall enter into force at the same time as the entry into force of the Convention.
I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of Your Excellency’s Note dated 4 July 2002 which reads as follows:
“I have the honour to refer to the Convention between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of South Africa for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital Gains which has been signed today and to make on behalf of the Government of the United Kingdom the following proposal:
It is understood that the secondary tax on companies is a tax payable in respect of the profits of South African companies and the allowance as a credit for this tax against United Kingdom tax is to be determined in accordance with the terms of sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph 2 of Article 21 of the Convention.
If the foregoing proposal is acceptable to the Government of the Republic of South Africa, I have the honour to suggest that the present Note and Your Excellency’s reply to that effect should be regarded as constituting an agreement between the two Governments in this matter, which shall enter into force at the same time as the entry into force of the Convention.”
The foregoing proposal being acceptable to the Government of the Republic of South Africa, I have the honour to confirm that Your Excellency’s Note and this reply shall be regarded as constituting an agreement between the two Governments in this matter which shall enter into force at the same time as the entry into force of the Convention.
United Kingdom / South Africa; HMRC, Synthesised text of the Multilateral Instrument and the 2002 UK-South Africa Double Taxation Convention; edition Official MLI synthesis of 2002 Convention as amended by 2010 Protocol; HMRC updated 17 June 2026; source section Exchange of notes; English; unreviewed source text, current applicability unverified; /editions/gb-za-2002-hmrc-mli-synthesis-html-v1/en/supplements/exchange-of-notes/
Disclaimers
Unreviewed machine transcription. Not a verified current-law consolidation or legal advice. Later changes may be missing.
Language switching retains source identifiers only. This is not reviewed legal or translational equivalence.
Page links are source references, not verified paragraph correspondence. Formatting and extraction errors may remain.
Noindex is not access control. This is a research preview, not a statement of authoritative or current law.
Source & edition
HMRC, Synthesised text of the Multilateral Instrument and the 2002 UK-South Africa Double Taxation Convention
Digest scope: retained online-source capture; no PDF binary verification
Edition
Official MLI synthesis of 2002 Convention as amended by 2010 Protocol; HMRC updated 17 June 2026
Text available here
English
Review
Unreviewed; qualified human review pending
Current applicability
Not verified
Signature
2002-07-04
Languages recorded in source metadata: English. This is not a promise of available text or a translation.
Edition notes and known limitations
Official HTML text capture, not Original PDF; human wording and current-law certification not claimed.
Block IDs are navigation aids, never invented legal paragraph numbers. Native extraction can flatten ordered-list styling; only printed source labels are retained.
Complete preamble, closing and all supplied integral protocol/notes are retained separately and searchable within this source.
Publisher synthesis, not an authentic treaty instrument. MLI replacement text and explanations are retained; original boxes/layout are not reproduced. Authentic Convention and MLI texts take precedence.
Source authority, text completeness and currentness still require human review.