Skip to content
tax-treaties.com
Find a pairAbout the sourcesResearch preview

Articles

Browse all articles
1ARTICLE 1 · General Scope2ARTICLE 2 · Taxes Covered3ARTICLE 3 · General Definitions4ARTICLE 4 · Residence5ARTICLE 5 · Permanent Establishment6ARTICLE 6 · Income From Immovable Property (Real Property)7ARTICLE 7 · Business Profits8ARTICLE 8 · Shipping and Air Transport9ARTICLE 9 · Associated Enterprises10ARTICLE 10 · Dividends11ARTICLE 11 · Interest12ARTICLE 12 · Royalties and Fees for Included Services13ARTICLE 13 · Gains14ARTICLE 14 · Permanent Establishment Tax15ARTICLE 15 · Independent Personal Services16ARTICLE 16 · Dependent Personal Services17ARTICLE 17 · Directors' Fees18ARTICLE 18 · Income Earned by Entertainers and Athletes19ARTICLE 19 · Remuneration and Pensions in Respect of Government Service20ARTICLE 20 · Private Pensions, Annuities, Alimony and Child Support21ARTICLE 21 · Payments Received by Students and Apprentices22ARTICLE 22 · Payments Received by Professors, Teachers23ARTICLE 23 · Other Income24ARTICLE 24 · Limitation on Benefits25ARTICLE 25 · Relief From Double Taxation26ARTICLE 26 · Non-discrimination27ARTICLE 27 · Mutual Agreement Procedure28ARTICLE 28 · Exchange of Information and Administrative Assistance29ARTICLE 29 · Diplomatic Agents and Consular officers30ARTICLE 30 · Entry Into Force31ARTICLE 31 · TerminationSigned closing and authentic-language clause · Signed closing and authentic-language clauseIntegral1989protocol; sourceOCR text, uncorrected · Integral1989protocol; sourceOCR text, uncorrectedRelated exchange of notes; sourceOCR text, uncorrected · Related exchange of notes; sourceOCR text, uncorrectedArticle12 memorandum and examples; notArticle31 · Article12 memorandum and examples; notArticle31

31 articles · English

Source & edition
Country pairs / India / United States

India / United States · IN US 1989 CONVENTION

Related exchange of notes; sourceOCR text, uncorrected

English · original source edition

Unreviewed · applicability unverifiedNative extraction · supporting layout limits; check original
Original & source
§ PDF page 60
EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
§ PDF page 60
New Delhi, September 12, 1989
§ PDF page 60
Excellency: I have the honor to refer to the Convention between the Government of the United states of America and the Government of the Republic of India for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income which was signed today (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention") and to confirm, on behalf of the Government of the United States of America, the following understandings reached between the two Governments: Both sides agree that a tax sparing credit shall not be provided in Article 25 (Relief from Double Taxation) of the Convention at this time. However, the Convention shall be promptly amended to incorporate a tax sparing credit provision if the United states hereafter amends its laws concerning the provision of tax sparing credits, or the United States reaches agreement on the provision of a tax sparing credit with any other country. Both sides also agree that, for purposes of paragraph 4(c) of Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) of the Convention, a person shall be considered to habitually secure orders in a Contracting State, wholly or almost wholly for an enterprise, only if: 1. such person frequently accepts orders for goods or merchandise on behalf of the enterprise; 2. substantially all of such person's sales-related activities in the Contracting state consist of activities for the enterprise;
§ PDF page 61
3. such person habitually represents to persons offering to buy goods or merchandise that acceptance of an order by such person constitutes the agreement of the enterprise to supply goods or merchandise under the terms and conditions specified in the order; and 4. the enterprise takes actions that give purchasers the basis for a reasonable belief that such person has authority to bind the enterprise. I have the honor to request Your Excellency to confirm the foregoing understandings of Your Excellency's Government. Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration.
§ PDF page 61
His Excellen Exc cy llenc JohnR.R.Hubb John ard Hubbard Dr. N.K. Sengupta, Sengupta, Amb Ambass assado adorr Secretary (Revenue), Secretary (Revenue), Mi Mini nist stry ry of Finance Finance, , Ne New w De Delh lhi. i.
§ PDF page 62
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NEW DELHI-110001
§ PDF page 62
September 12, 1989
§ PDF page 62
Excellency: I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of Your Excellency's Note of today's date, which reads as follows: "I have the honor to refer to the Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of India for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income which was signed today (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention") and to confirm, on behalf of the Government of the United States of America, the following understandings reached between the two Governments: Both sides agree that a tax sparing credit shall not be provided in Article 25 (Relief from Double Taxation) of the Convention at this time. However, the Convention shall be promptly amended to incorporate a tax sparing credit provision if the United States hereafter amends its laws concerning the provision of tax sparing credits, or the United States reaches agreement on the provision of a tax sparing credit with any other country. Both sides also agree that, for purposes of paragraph 4(c) of Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) of the Convention, a person shall be considered to habitually secure orders in a Contracting state, wholly or almost wholly for an enterprise, only if:
§ PDF page 63
SECRETARY 1. such person frequently accepts orders for goods or merchandise on behalf of the enterprise; 2. substantially all of such person's sales-related activities in the Contracting state consist of activities for the enterprise; 3. such person habitually represents to persons offering to buy goods or merchandise that acceptance of an order by such person constitutes the agreement of the enterprise to supply goods or merchandise under the terms and conditions specified in the order; and 4. the enterprise takes actions that give purchasers the basis for a reasonable belief that such person has authority to bind the enterprise." I have the honour to confirm the understandings contained in Your Excellency's Note, on behalf of the Government of the Republic of India. Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration.
§ PDF page 63
His Excellency N. K. Sengupta Dr. John R. Hubbard, Ambassador of the United States of America, New Delhi.
§ PDF page 64
EMBASSY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
§ PDF page 64
New Delhi, September 12, 1989
§ PDF page 64
Excellency:
§ PDF page 64
I have the honor to refer to the Convention signed today between the United States of America and the Republic of India for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and to Inform you on behalf of the United States of America of the following: During the course of the negotiations leading to conclusion of the Convention signed today, the negotiators developed and agreed upon a memorandum of understanding intended to give guidance both to the taxpayers and the tax authorities of our two countries In Interpreting aspects of Article 12 (Royalties and Fees for Included Services) relating to the scope of included services. This memorandum of understanding represents the current views of the United States Government with respect to these aspects of Article 12, and it is my Government's understanding that it also represents the current views of the Indian Government. It Is also my Government's view that as our Governments gain experience in administering the Convention, and particularly Article 12, the competent authorities may develop and publish amendments to the memorandum of understanding and further understandings and interpretations of the Convention.
§ PDF page 65
common view of the purpose of the memorandum of understanding relating to Article 12 of the Convention. Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration .
§ PDF page 65
His Excellency John R. Hubbard Dr. N.K. Sengupta, Ambassador Secretary (Revenue), Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.
§ PDF page 66
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NEW DELHI-110001
§ PDF page 66
September 12, 1989
§ PDF page 66
Excellency: I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of Your Excellency's Note of today's date, which reads as follows: "I have the honor to refer to the Convention signed today between the United States of America and the Republic of India for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and to inform you on behalf of the United States of America of the following: During the course of the negotiations leading to conclusion of the Convention signed today, the negotiators developed and agreed upon a memorandum of understanding intended to give guidance both to the taxpayers and the tax authorities of our two countries in interpreting aspects of Article 12 (Royalties and Fees for Included Services) relating to the scope of included services. This memorandum of understanding represents the current views of the United states Government with respect to these aspects of Article 12, and it is my Government's understanding that it also represents the current views of the Indian Government. It is also my Government's view that as our Governments gain experience in administering the Convention, and particularly Article 12, the competent authorities may
§ PDF page 67
SECRETARY
§ PDF page 67
develop and publish amendments to the memorandum of understanding and further understandings and interpretations of the Convention. If this position meets with the approval of the Government of the Republic of India, this letter and your reply thereto will indicate that our Governments share a common view of the purpose of the memorandum of understanding relating to Article 12 of the Convention." I have the honour to confirm the understandings contained in Your Excellency's Note, on behalf of the Government of the Republic of India. Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration.
§ PDF page 67
His Excellency N. K. Sengupta Dr. John R. Hubbard, Ambassador of the United States of America, New Delhi.
Citation to select or copy

India / United States; IRS/Treasury official source publication; edition in-us-1989-convention; source section Related exchange of notes; sourceOCR text, uncorrected; English; unreviewed source text, current applicability unverified; /editions/in-us-1989-convention/en/supplements/exchange-of-notes/

Disclaimers

Unreviewed machine transcription. Not a verified current-law consolidation or legal advice. Later changes may be missing.

Language switching retains source identifiers only. This is not reviewed legal or translational equivalence.

Page links are source references, not verified paragraph correspondence. Formatting and extraction errors may remain.

Noindex is not access control. This is a research preview, not a statement of authoritative or current law.

Source & edition

IRS/Treasury official source publication

  • Original PDF Official source website ↗

    SHA-256 b0d64da3fce51580cc0f43b1fb56c6f8c6aaf7936f6c192d9781279d948b2007

    Digest scope: original PDF binary

Retained native extraction Article provenance

Authentic-language clause: In case of divergence between the two texts, the English text shall be the operative one. Only the English source text is supplied here; no Hindi translation or alignment is claimed.

Edition
in-us-1989-convention
Text available here
English
Review
Unreviewed; qualified human review pending
Current applicability
Not verified
Signature
1989-09-12
Currentness verified
False

Languages recorded in source metadata: English, हिन्दी. This is not a promise of available text or a translation.

Edition notes and known limitations

Private review only. Original source edition, not current-law certification.

Full text: native/in-us-1989-convention/layout.txt; physical page ledger: native/in-us-1989-convention/quality.json

Known protocols and technical/status reference links retained separately in source-index.json. No silent merging.

REPAIR CANDIDATE: original source-provided OCR text. Article 31 now ends before closing at native offset84587, not at the attached technical examples. Duplicated front matter pages1–4 and signature text pages55/61 isolated outside article bodies. 31actual body headings verified with form-feed-aware grammar; body duplicate-word check0, replacement0. Specific Article31 boundary accepted after retained-PDF inspection; full wording and human legal review remain unperformed.

Fresh6.1Sol actualPDF render inspection confirmsArticle31 ends onphysical54, closing55, integralProtocol56, MOU68 andExample1page70. Boundarygatepassed; human/current-law/entirewordingreview NOTperformed. Source-providedOCRdamage elsewhere is preserved and flagged, not silently repaired. Specific boundary and source-input admission recorded; OCR artifacts are preserved, not silently corrected.

English andHindi are equallyauthentic; the signed clause expressly provides that theEnglishtext isoperativeincaseofdivergence. Thispublication suppliesonly anEnglishreader, not aHindi translation.

Known supporting-text OCR artifacts must be visible as a concise source-quality label on supplement readers. Original PDF remains the verification reference; text-block IDs are not legal paragraph numbers.

Source authority, text completeness and currentness still require human review.

Retained metadata & integrity record

← Integral1989protocol; sourceOCR text, uncorrectedArticle12 memorandum and examples; notArticle31 →

All articles in this edition · Other editions for this pair

Treaty source library · research previewCoverage & limitationsOperator / AnbieterBisherige Quellenbibliothek